The Effects of the Pandemic on the Research Output and Strategies of Early Career Researchers and Doctoral Candidates

Caux, Basil Cahusac de

doi:10.1007/978-981-19-7757-2_24

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This number was still higher, however, than the pre-pandemic, pretransition baseline average. Perhaps researchers were able to submit new manuscripts during the lockdown period in the initial months of the pandemic but, as it continued, online teaching and travel restrictions disrupted research plans, particularly for new projects and early-career researchers (Breuning et al 2021;Cahusac de Caux 2022;Douglas et al 2022;Jamali et al 2023;Squazzoni et al 2021;Sverdlik, Hall, and Vallerand 2022). Although it is not conclusive, this preliminary descriptive evidence is consistent with a short-term boost in new submissions, with a subsequent lull in the second and third years of the pandemic.…”

Section: New Submissionsmentioning

confidence: 86%

TheAmerican Political Science ReviewDuring the COVID-19 Pandemic

Dion,

Strolovitch

2024

APSC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

On June 1, 2020, a little more than two months after the World Health Organization’s COVID-19 pandemic declaration, our editorial team assumed the leadership of the American Political Science Review (APSR). Although this confluence of events makes it difficult to isolate the pandemic’s effect on new submissions and review processes, this article describes submission and review patterns in the two and a half years before and after the onset of the pandemic and the editorial transition. It describes our preliminary observations regarding what the patterns suggest about the pandemic’s impact on the APSR.1

show abstract

Section: New Submissionsmentioning

confidence: 86%

TheAmerican Political Science ReviewDuring the COVID-19 Pandemic

Dion,

Strolovitch

2024

APSC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

The impact of AI on the post‐pandemic generation of early career researchers: What we know or can predict from the published literature

Herman,

Nicholas,

Abrizah

et al. 2024

Learned Publishing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This extensive literature review is not a stand‐alone paper, as it was conducted to help set the scene for the third and current stage of the Harbinger of Change project (H‐3), which is focusing on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on early career researchers (ECRs). Its purpose is to inform the design, scope and question‐forming of the ongoing interview project (2024–). The overarching aim of the review is to establish what we know of the already extant and/or predicted opportunities and challenges that AI‐driven technologies present to researchers, in general, and the cohort of junior researchers among them, in particular. It was found that very little empirical evidence exists of what is happening to ECRs on the ground, and that tends to be drowned in a sea of forecasts and prognostications. However, down the road there are clear benefits accruing to ECRs and, arguably, the most appealing for novice researchers must be the benefits of enhancing their productivity, the key to all scholarly rewards, inclusive of career advancement.

show abstract

The Effects of the Pandemic on the Research Output and Strategies of Early Career Researchers and Doctoral Candidates

Cited by 2 publications

References 45 publications

TheAmerican Political Science ReviewDuring the COVID-19 Pandemic

TheAmerican Political Science ReviewDuring the COVID-19 Pandemic

The impact of AI on the post‐pandemic generation of early career researchers: What we know or can predict from the published literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About