2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of through-thickness shear stress on the formability of sheet metal–A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang and Wang's [37] research concluded that an FLD that considers induced stress in the thickness direction is more accurate than the FLD of the plane stress mode. In fact, through-thickness shear stresses can improve the forming limit of sheet metals [97]. Moreover, when strain states occur below and within the left diagonal (ε 1 = ε 2 ), the presence of a compressive hydrostatic stress component in the thickness direction mitigates the risk of necking.…”
Section: D Stress Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang and Wang's [37] research concluded that an FLD that considers induced stress in the thickness direction is more accurate than the FLD of the plane stress mode. In fact, through-thickness shear stresses can improve the forming limit of sheet metals [97]. Moreover, when strain states occur below and within the left diagonal (ε 1 = ε 2 ), the presence of a compressive hydrostatic stress component in the thickness direction mitigates the risk of necking.…”
Section: D Stress Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After deformation, they measured the mesh configuration and found the presence of through-thickness shear in the tool direction [11]. The presence of out-of-plane through-thickness stresses can lead to improved formability in the case of ISF, as suggested by Ma and Wang [12]. They further suggested that the conventional M-K model, which includes in-plane stresses only, needs to be extended and should also consider the through-thickness shear stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Generally, their constitutive response is modeled and calibrated by mainly considering the in-plane material behavior, while the throughthickness one is often neglected based on the plane stress assumption. However, in some applications -for instance the sheet metal forming of complex geometries -the state of stress can deviate from the plane stress assumption and a complete 3D description is necessary [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Recently, inverse methods such as the Virtual Fields Method (VFM) or the Finite Element Model Updating (FEMU), coupled with a full-field measurement technique, have been distinguished as efficient strategies for the calibration of complex plasticity models [1]. The use of heterogeneous strain fields, in fact, offers a larger amount of material information compared to the classical standard test, enriching the identification process and, in general, reducing the experimental effort for the calibration [2].
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%