2013
DOI: 10.1353/etc.2013.0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Tier II Check-in/Check-out Including Adaptation for Non-Responders on the Off-Task Behavior of Elementary Students in a Residential Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary investigator experienced difficulty collecting IOA data in the latter part of the pilot due to end of the year meetings and conferences. A rate of 38% IOA; however, is an adequate measure of reliability consistent with current CICO literature in AE settings (Swoszowski et al, 2013). Interval agreement was established using the Kennedy (2005) formula to calculate IOA.…”
Section: Interobserver Agreementmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The primary investigator experienced difficulty collecting IOA data in the latter part of the pilot due to end of the year meetings and conferences. A rate of 38% IOA; however, is an adequate measure of reliability consistent with current CICO literature in AE settings (Swoszowski et al, 2013). Interval agreement was established using the Kennedy (2005) formula to calculate IOA.…”
Section: Interobserver Agreementmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Any errors in implementation were noted on the 15-item PL-CICO fidelity checklist (Figure 2) and the daily point card (Figure 1). The fidelity checklist was adapted from those used in similar CICO studies (Filter et al, 2007;Swoszowski et al, 2013); with 11 items associated with the peer mentor portion of the CICO cycle (four items were associated with the housing component). Thus, peer mentor fidelity was calculated by dividing the sum of student fidelity items completed accurately by the sum of the total items required.…”
Section: Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Swoszowski et al (2013) designed Check-in/Check-up/Check-out to address the argument that students may demonstrate limited responsiveness to CICO because they require more frequent mentor contact and reinforcement. They added a midday check-up to the typical CICO procedures, which allowed students to receive reinforcement more often and provided students with more frequent contact with their mentors.…”
Section: Check-in/check-outmentioning
confidence: 99%