1994
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02030.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Topic Familiarity on Second Language Listening Comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
45
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the treatment lessons, the participants had the opportunity to deal with key vocabulary items that were presented in the same context as they would hear in the text. This is consistent with previous studies (Caplan-Carbin, 1997;Ervin, 1992;Gatbonton & Segalowits, 1988;Sadighi & Zare 2002;Schmidt & Rinehart, 1994;William & Thomas, 1991).…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the treatment lessons, the participants had the opportunity to deal with key vocabulary items that were presented in the same context as they would hear in the text. This is consistent with previous studies (Caplan-Carbin, 1997;Ervin, 1992;Gatbonton & Segalowits, 1988;Sadighi & Zare 2002;Schmidt & Rinehart, 1994;William & Thomas, 1991).…”
Section: )supporting
confidence: 82%
“…That is, the results indicated that cultural familiarization of the text has a significant effect on listening comprehension. Listeners are expected to achieve the writer's intended meaning by combining existing information with what they listen (Bacon, 1992;Chastain, 1988;Chiang & Dunkel, 1992;Long, 1990;Markham & Latham, 1987;Mueller, 1980;Schmidt-Rinehart, 1994).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students' existing knowledge or background knowledge plays a significant role in their comprehension of the aural texts (Chiang & Dunkel, 1992;Platt & Brooks, 1994;Rubin, 1994;Schmidt-Rinehart, 1994). Listeners draw on their pre-existing knowledge to help them interpret the text and to create expectations of what they are about to hear (Bacon, 1992;Tsui & Fullilove, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most research concerned with the evaluation of second language (L2) comprehension has focused on reading rather than listening because the process of reading is more easily observed and manipulated (Osada, 2004). That said, research findings regarding reading comprehension often fail to map fully onto the processes involved in listening comprehension (Schmidt-Rinehart, 1994). For example, listeners have a worse memory for spoken information than readers do for written information, with proportionally more details recalled by readers and proportionally more main ideas by listeners (Lund, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%