2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0351.2006.00272.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of transition and political instability on foreign direct investment inflows

Abstract: This paper examines the effects of transition and of political instability on foreign direct investment (FDI) flows to the transition economies of Central Europe, the Baltics and the Balkans. We find that FDI flows to transition economies unaffected by conflict and political instability exceed those that would be expected for comparable West European countries. Success with stabilization and reform increased the volume of FDI inflows. In the case of Balkan counties, conflict and instability reduced FDI inflows… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, Political instability is not good since it will adversely affect the country's economic development and growth process by its unhealthy dent on the physical and human resources. When the country's Political Stability condition is not good, foreign investors will hesitate to bring any projects until they are assured that the business environment would be conducive and favorable (Brada et al, 2005;UNCTAD, 2010;Word Bank, 2011). In the case of Pakistan, World Bank report, published in 2011 categorically mentioned that the private sector's low investment in the country is largely attributed to the situation of political instability and corruption.…”
Section: Political Stability and Fdi Inflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, Political instability is not good since it will adversely affect the country's economic development and growth process by its unhealthy dent on the physical and human resources. When the country's Political Stability condition is not good, foreign investors will hesitate to bring any projects until they are assured that the business environment would be conducive and favorable (Brada et al, 2005;UNCTAD, 2010;Word Bank, 2011). In the case of Pakistan, World Bank report, published in 2011 categorically mentioned that the private sector's low investment in the country is largely attributed to the situation of political instability and corruption.…”
Section: Political Stability and Fdi Inflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bevan and Estrin (2004) reported that, based on a panel data of bilateral flows of FDI from Western countries in eleven Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, key announcements on progress in EU accession had a significant and positive impact on FDI inflows, but FDI flows to transition economies are not influenced significantly by market evaluations of country-specific risk. Brada et al (2006) investigated the impact of political factors on FDI flows into seven transition economies in Europe from 1993 to 2001. They found that the initial cumulative inflation rate, the cumulative GDP decline, the share of the private sector in GDP, and change in the unemployment rate significantly reduced FDI inflows.…”
Section: Locational Determinants Of Fdimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results to our findings were discovered by other studies (UNCTAD, 1998;Büthe and Milner, 2008;Wells and Ahmed, 2007), implying that BITs do not play a primary role in increasing FDI flows. Beside BITs, there are a number of other determinant factors that influence investors' decisions (Schneider and Frey, 1985;Brada et al, 2005). The increase in the number of BITs over the last decade is largely a consequence of the transformation of investorstate relations, in which international investment law has become a significant component of such development (Schill, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, some other research suggests that beside BITs, a number of economic and political factors seem to be the most significant determinates that influence investors' decisions (Schneider and Frey, 1985;Brada et al, 2005). Although it is widely acknowledged that investors place their capital in countries with stable political environment; however, nowadays, despite political instability, investors will invest in countries, where the ratio of benefit is higher than the risk (Rios-Morales et.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%