2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.665122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Transition and Political Instability on Foreign Direct Investment Inflows: Central Europe and the Balkans

Abstract: This paper examines the effects of transition and of political instability on foreign direct investment (FDI) flows to the transition economies of Central Europe, the Baltics and the Balkans. We find that FDI flows to transition economies unaffected by conflict and political instability exceed those that would be expected for comparable West European countries. Success with stabilization and reform increased the volume of FDI inflows. In the case of Balkan counties, conflict and instability reduced FDI inflows… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14 More recently, firms from the transition economies have begun to undertake investments outside their own countries. While the stock of outward FDI is still no more than 15-20% of the stock of FDI in the region, the growth of these 14 Studies include Bevan and Estrin, 2004, Carstensen and Toubal, 2004, Brada et al 2006 15 flows has accelerated rapidly in this decade. Not all or perhaps even the majority of outward FDI from transition economies is driven by money laundering and capital flight, but a review of the data strongly suggests that illicit capital flight and money laundering have been important drivers of FDI.…”
Section: An Overview Of Fdi From Transition Economiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 More recently, firms from the transition economies have begun to undertake investments outside their own countries. While the stock of outward FDI is still no more than 15-20% of the stock of FDI in the region, the growth of these 14 Studies include Bevan and Estrin, 2004, Carstensen and Toubal, 2004, Brada et al 2006 15 flows has accelerated rapidly in this decade. Not all or perhaps even the majority of outward FDI from transition economies is driven by money laundering and capital flight, but a review of the data strongly suggests that illicit capital flight and money laundering have been important drivers of FDI.…”
Section: An Overview Of Fdi From Transition Economiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the FDI that came into transition economies has been used to purchase existing firms rather than to finance new Greenfield investments (Brada et al, 2006); however, even FDI used for mergers and acquisitions has a positive effect on domestic capital formation (Šohinger and Harrison, 2004) because investors do contribute additional capital to their acquisitions. Moreover, as Hunya (1996) shows in the case of Hungary, foreign firms have higher profits and reinvest a much higher share of it than do domestically owned firms, thus increasing capital formation in the future.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as Hunya (1996) shows in the case of Hungary, foreign firms have higher profits and reinvest a much higher share of it than do domestically owned firms, thus increasing capital formation in the future. Another benefit of FDI is that it brings in new technology and managerial skills (Brada et al, 2006). Thus, foreign-owned firms are likely to be more productive (Hunya, 1996;Sgard, 2001) and to use more advanced technologies (Voicu, 2004).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four of our five hypotheses are therefore supported by cointegration analysis. FDI flows into the Czech economy have been affected by merger and acquisition activity on an international level which, according to Brada, Kutan and Yigit (2004) influenced the Czech Republic's SM. In the Brada, Kutan and Yigit (2004) study, this relationship did not materialize, possibly because they did not use cointegration as an adjustment for the short-term effects of merger and acquisition activity on the overall stock market.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%