2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1378-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of two nights of sleep deprivation with or without energy restriction on immune indices at rest and in response to cold exposure

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of two nights of sleep deprivation with or without energy restriction on immune indices at rest and in response to cold exposure. On three randomised occasions ten males slept normally [mean (SD): 436 (21) min night(-1); CON], were totally sleep-deprived (SDEP), or were totally sleep-deprived and 90% energy-restricted (SDEP + ER) for 53 h. After 53 h (1200 h) participants performed a seated cold air test (CAT) at 0.0 degrees C until T (re) decreased to 36.0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unstimulated whole saliva samples were collected from participants using a passive dribble for 5 min into a preweighed universal tube (HR 120-EC, A & D instruments, Tokyo, Japan) between 0530 and 0600 hours at baseline, pre-Weld exercise and post-Weld exercise (Costa et al 2010). All saliva samples were collected while the participant sat quietly after Wrst rinsing their mouth with water and swallowing.…”
Section: Saliva Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unstimulated whole saliva samples were collected from participants using a passive dribble for 5 min into a preweighed universal tube (HR 120-EC, A & D instruments, Tokyo, Japan) between 0530 and 0600 hours at baseline, pre-Weld exercise and post-Weld exercise (Costa et al 2010). All saliva samples were collected while the participant sat quietly after Wrst rinsing their mouth with water and swallowing.…”
Section: Saliva Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well known that acute cold stress exposure increases the levels of catecholamine (Srámek et al, 2000; PalmieriSmith et al, 2007) and other stress hormones (Sramek et al, 2000;Pilcher et al, 2002;LaVoy et al, 2011) which impairs cognitive performance (Elzinga et al, 2005;Robinson et al, 2008). Furthermore, very mild decreases in core temperature (~0.5 °C) have little or even stimulatory effects on the immune function (Brenner et al, 1999), but the modest (~1 °C) decreases in core temperature have depressive effects on the immune function (Costa et al, 2010). Sandi and Pinelo-Nava (2007) showed that the effect of stress exposure on learning and memory is complex and is determined by the factors such as the length of stress exposure, nature of the stress stimulus, specific cognitive function examined, age and gender.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we assume that cold exposure, limited by time in earlier studies, might induce different responses on T re and subject's cognitive function could be affected differently. According to cold stress studies the modest (~1 °C) decreases in core temperature have depressive effects on the immune function (Costa et al, 2010), increases the levels of catecholamine (Srámek et al, 2000;Palmieri-Smith et al, 2007) and other stress hormones (Srámek et al, 2000;Pilcher et al, 2002;LaVoy et al, 2011), thus we hypothesized that the method used in our study (exposure to cold-water limited by 3 Cold impact on cognitive function the set point of T re 35.5 °C) should induce high cold stress and manifest cognitive performance on tests involving memory and attention. (McArdle et al, 1984) using a medical skinfold caliper (Seahan, SH5020, Masan, Korea).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thereafter, nude body mass, blood and urine samples were collected at 24 h, 48 h, immediately before the CAT, and immediately after the CAT. The blood samples obtained were predominantly for the assessment of immune function as reported previously (Costa et al 2010). At 1200 h on day one (5 h into each trial) and day two (29 h into each trial), participants performed a 90 min steady state walk at 50% VO2max, followed by a 15 min seated rest and then a 5 km time trial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%