1988
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.1120210407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of ultrarapid freezing on meiotic and mitotic spindles of mouse oocytes and embryos

Abstract: Preovulatory mouse oocytes and 2-cell embryos were frozen with dimethyl sulfoxide and propanediol by an ultrarapid method. The survival of frozen oocytes was low (33-34%) compared to that of 2-cell embryos (78-79%) with either cryoprotectant. Development to blastocysts after postthaw culture was about 7-15% for oocytes and 79-80% for the embryos. Ultrarapid freezing preserves cell structure quite well as revealed by electron microscopy, but meiotic oocytes and late 2-cell embryos undergoing mitosis showed evid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there was no difference in the types of damage observed within various groups. Similar types of damage have been observed in earlier studies (Sathananthan et al, 1988;Dhali et al, 2000;Albarracin et al, 2005a,b). Post-thaw survivability of buffalo oocytes in this study was 37.6-61.3%, with survivability increasing with time in IVM prior to vitrification, but survivability was lower in all vitrified groups than that of non-vitrified oocytes (95.5%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In addition, there was no difference in the types of damage observed within various groups. Similar types of damage have been observed in earlier studies (Sathananthan et al, 1988;Dhali et al, 2000;Albarracin et al, 2005a,b). Post-thaw survivability of buffalo oocytes in this study was 37.6-61.3%, with survivability increasing with time in IVM prior to vitrification, but survivability was lower in all vitrified groups than that of non-vitrified oocytes (95.5%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In this respect, oocytes are susceptible to damage during cooling and/or freezing and thawing (Leibo 1980) because they are structurally complex and relatively impermeable to both water and cryoprotectants (CPAs; Agca et al 1998). While the specific molecular elements or pathways disrupted during oocyte cryopreservation are not well characterised, many ultrastructural elements critical to the maintenance of developmental competence are damaged during freezing and thawing (Parks & Ruffing 1992), including the plasma membrane (Ashwood-Smith et al 1988), the actin cytoskeleton and the meiotic spindle (Sathananthan et al 1988, Park et al 1997. Oocyte cryopreservation can also lead to 'zona hardening', as a result of CPA-induced premature cortical granule release (Ghetler et al 2006), and it is for this reason that cryopreserved human oocytes are usually fertilised by intracytoplasmic sperm injection rather than by conventional IVF (for reviews see Coticchio et al 2007, Gook & Edgar 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while live offspring have been produced using cryopreserved oocytes in a number of species (e.g. man: Chen 1986; mouse: Sathananthan et al 1988;cattle: Lim et al 1991;horse: Maclellan et al 2002), the overall success in terms of developmental competence is disappointing (Porcu 2001). It appears that the cryopreservability of oocytes is complicated by their structural complexity, low surface area:volume ratio and relatively low plasma membrane permeability to water and/or cryoprotectants (Leibo 1980, Agca et al 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%