1972
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-197204000-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Variations in Inspiratory Expiratory Ratio on Cardiorespiratory Function During Controlled Ventilation in Normo-, Hypo- And Hypervolaemic Dogs

Abstract: Changes in cardiorespiratory function resulting from the use of three different inspiratory: expiratory ratios (1:2, 0.5:2.5, and 2:1) have been studied in normo-, hypo-and hypervolaemic dogs. Deadspace/tidal volume ratio increased slightly with the 0.5:2.5 ratio in all the states of blood volume but the changes were not statistically significant. There was a significant increase in arterial-alveolar Pco 2 difference on the 0.5:2.5 ratio in the hypervolaemic state and there was a significant reduction in the P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pooled results quoted in this paper were compiled from the studies on 16 dogs ventilated with a +o waveform as produced by a Cape ventilator (Sykes et al, 1970), a further 15 dogs ventilated with a sinusoidal flow pattern (Adams et al, 1970), and 16 dogs ventilated with a 1:2 inspiratory: expiratory ratio on the Bamet ventilator (Finlay et al, 1970). These results represented the control values in each of the studies mentioned and, although the inspiratory flow pattern was slightly different, the inspiratory: expiratory ratio of 1:2 and the frequency of 20 b.p.m.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pooled results quoted in this paper were compiled from the studies on 16 dogs ventilated with a +o waveform as produced by a Cape ventilator (Sykes et al, 1970), a further 15 dogs ventilated with a sinusoidal flow pattern (Adams et al, 1970), and 16 dogs ventilated with a 1:2 inspiratory: expiratory ratio on the Bamet ventilator (Finlay et al, 1970). These results represented the control values in each of the studies mentioned and, although the inspiratory flow pattern was slightly different, the inspiratory: expiratory ratio of 1:2 and the frequency of 20 b.p.m.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%