1995
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1995.1003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Varying Goal Difficulty Operationalizations on Goal Setting Outcomes and Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wright and his colleagues discovered that goal operationalization and goal level interacted to affect subjects' performance. In the Wright et al (1995) study and in the present study, subjects' perceptions of their goals were more important than the objective goal level. Regardless of the objective goal difficulty, the subjects' interpretation of its difficulty and the effects of personal goal levels were a key factor in motivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wright and his colleagues discovered that goal operationalization and goal level interacted to affect subjects' performance. In the Wright et al (1995) study and in the present study, subjects' perceptions of their goals were more important than the objective goal level. Regardless of the objective goal difficulty, the subjects' interpretation of its difficulty and the effects of personal goal levels were a key factor in motivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Assigned goals' limited effects on self-efficacy may be related to findings of Wright et al (1995). Wright and his colleagues discovered that goal operationalization and goal level interacted to affect subjects' performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The importance of setting goals to motivate higher levels of performance has been examined comprehensively in the goal-setting © The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 AFAANZ theory literature (e.g. Locke and Latham, 1990;Fatseas and Hirst, 1992;Wright et al ., 1995). In particular, goal-setting theory posits that a goal that is specific and difficult (but attainable) can motivate individuals to exert greater effort towards goal attainment and, therefore, achieving better performance.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, research on goal-setting theory is mostly confined to a single-goal setting (e.g. Locke and Latham, 1990;Wright et al ., 1995). An implicit assumption in these studies is that these findings can also be generalized to a multiple-goal setting.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By better understanding how goal levels differentially affect other variables, more effective goal-setting programs can be developed by industry. Wright, Hollenbeck, Wolf, and McMahan (1995) designed a study that used a partially ipsative condition. They had one group of individuals who were randomly assigned to one of three goal conditions (easy, moderate, difficult).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%