Abstract. We report here the evaluation of the potential of a serologic test to determine the endemicity of onchocercal infection in hyper, meso, and hypoendemic communities by the detection of antibodies to a cocktail of recombinant antigens. Parasitologic parameters of infection prevalence and intensity were compared with serologic results. Infection prevalence by serology was consistently but not significantly higher than that defined by parasitology. Differences between the communities defined by microfilarial load (CMFL) and a measurement of Onchocerca volvulus-specific antibody levels (serologic index [SI]) were similar. When stratified by age, differences were more significant in the younger age groups. If a sentinel population of 5-15-year-old individuals was used to compare communities, all could be equally ranked by serologic and parasitologic parameters. The SI of the sentinel population gave a better distinction between each community than the SI of the whole and would be sufficiently sensitive to measure the changes in endemicity that would be required for onchocerciasis control programs.An estimated 18 million people are infected by the parasitic filaria Onchocerca volvulus, the causative agent of human onchocerciasis or river blindness. Control of the disease is being attempted world-wide by vector control and/or large scale distribution of ivermectin, a drug effective against the pathogenic microfilarial stage of the parasite. The Onchocerciasis Control Program (OCP) in West Africa has been successful in lowering the risk of blindness due to infection with O. volvulus. Thirty million people in 11 West African countries have been estimated to be protected from damaging ocular legions caused by this parasite. 1 A diagnostic test is urgently required by control programs such as the OCP to both monitor the success at reducing the prevalence of infection or to monitor recrudescence in areas where transmission has been successfully interrupted and vector control ceased.2 The method of parasitologic diagnosis is the examination of skin snips for the presence of microfilariae (mf) collected with punches and, although exquisitely specific, it is not very sensitive, particularly in areas of low transmission. Skin snips are also unable to detect prepatent infection, which would result in a critical delay in the detection of recrudescence of transmission. Consequently, control operations would be instigated later and may require implementation on a much wider scale. Finally, with the increase in the prevalence of blood-borne viruses, the substitution of the skin snip is desirable due to problems of sterilization of the expensive punches.Serologic assays based on antibody detection are one possible alternative method of determining infection by this parasite. There have been a number of reports of tests capable of this (for a review see Bradley and Unnasch 3 ). We have previously reported the development of a serologic test able to detect specific O. volvulus antibodies to a cocktail of three recombinant anti...