Both maladaptive and adaptive emotion regulation strategies have been
linked with psychopathology. However, previous studies have largely examined
them separately, and little research has examined the interplay of these
strategies cross-sectionally or longitudinally in patients undergoing
psychological treatment. This study examined the use and interplay of adaptive
and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies in 81 patients receiving
cognitive-behavioral interventions for comorbid alcohol use and anxiety
disorders. Patients completed measures of emotion regulation strategy use and
symptoms of psychopathology pre- and post-treatment. Cross-sectionally, higher
use of maladaptive strategies (e.g., denial) was significantly related to higher
psychopathology pre- and post-treatment, whereas higher use of adaptive
strategies (e.g., acceptance) only significantly related to lower
psychopathology post-treatment. Prospectively, changes in maladaptive
strategies, but not changes in adaptive strategies, were significantly
associated with post-treatment psychopathology. However, for patients with
higher pre-treatment maladaptive strategy use, gains in adaptive strategies were
significantly associated with lower post-treatment psychopathology. These
findings suggest that psychological treatments may maximize efficacy by
considering patient skill use at treatment outset. By better understanding a
patient's initial emotion regulation skills, clinicians may be better
able to optimize treatment outcomes by emphasizing maladaptive strategy use
reduction predominately, or in conjunction with increasing adaptive skill
use.