1999
DOI: 10.1006/jaer.1999.0464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Vertical Sprayer Boom Movements on the Uniformity of Spray Distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, we shall assume the boom to be rigid. Incidentally, this latter assumption is confirmed as reasonable by the manufacturer of the machine (based on empirical observations) and by Parloo et al (2005), Clijmans et al (2000), Langenakens et al (1999) and Anthonis et al (2005) on the basis that the resonant frequency of vertical boom suspensions for long booms is generally of the order of 0.1 Hz and the first flexible vertical mode is usually located in the range between 0.6-1.5 Hz.…”
Section: The Design Problemmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Further, we shall assume the boom to be rigid. Incidentally, this latter assumption is confirmed as reasonable by the manufacturer of the machine (based on empirical observations) and by Parloo et al (2005), Clijmans et al (2000), Langenakens et al (1999) and Anthonis et al (2005) on the basis that the resonant frequency of vertical boom suspensions for long booms is generally of the order of 0.1 Hz and the first flexible vertical mode is usually located in the range between 0.6-1.5 Hz.…”
Section: The Design Problemmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…However, when height control is applied, this CV value decreases to 5.17%, 4.98%, 4.09% respectively for driving speeds of 12, 8 and 4 km h -1 . The reason for the increase in CV value with the increase in speed can be explained as follows; The increase in the driving speed reduces the measurement accuracy of the ultrasonic sensor (Iida & Bursk 2002;Zaman et al 2007;Koc & Keskin 2011), causing the test platform vibration to increase (Langenakens et al 1999;Pontelli & Mucheroni 2012). WSP card samples obtained from field trials for three driving speed are shown in Table 5, where the number under each sample represents the percentage of the…”
Section: Field Tests Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For wide-angle nozzles, a lower spray height is preferred. For example, for a nozzle spacing of 50 cm, a spray height of 50 cm is recommended at a 110° nozzle angle (Langenakens et al 1999;Wilson et al 2008). However, when the spray is being applied, the spray height is constantly changing due to fluctuations in the land structure, to hills, tyres and vertical vibrations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boom sprayers are widely used in crop protection on the fields against diseases, weeds, pathogens, and others [2,3] . The width of the mainstream boom sprayer in China is about 10-24 m, unwanted boom motions typically occur when sprayer tires go over uneven terrain field surfaces [4,5] . Spray boom motions, mainly vertically rolling has a dramatic effect on the spray distribution pattern [6,7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%