1970
DOI: 10.1002/cne.901400106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of Wulst ablations on color, brightness and pattern discrimination in pigeons (Columba livia)

Abstract: Pigeons were trained to peck at a transparent response key on which was projected either a color, brightness or pattern discrimination problem. Each subject was trained on only one of these problems. Training was continued until the subjects had reached asymptote. After reaching asymptote, subjects received brain ablations (by subpial suction) according to the following design: hyperstriate group, tissue removed from the Wulst; ablated controls, tissue removed from the neostriatum and corticoid areas; operated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the discriminative impairment found by Macphail (1971), Pritz, Mead, andNorthcutt (1970), andZeigler (1963) on go/no-go discriminations was not replicated here. As noted above, Macphail (1975) also failed to replicate this effect.…”
Section: Wulst Lesionscontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the discriminative impairment found by Macphail (1971), Pritz, Mead, andNorthcutt (1970), andZeigler (1963) on go/no-go discriminations was not replicated here. As noted above, Macphail (1975) also failed to replicate this effect.…”
Section: Wulst Lesionscontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…An additional purpose was to examine the effects of these lesions on a particular discriminative learning task. There have been two reports of deficits on visual discriminative learning after Wulst lesions (Pritz, Mead, & Northcutt, 1970;Zeigler, 1963). These findings have not been confirmed by other authors, however (Hodos, Karten, & Bonbright, 1973;Macphail, 1976b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The effects of lesions of the different visual stations on visually guided behavior support, in general, the concept of a dual visual system, in showing that consistent deficits in pattern, brightness, and color discrimi nation follow lesions of the tectofugal system [Hodos and Karten, 1966, 1974Hodos, 1969;Hodos and Fletcher, 1974;Jarvis, 1974]; whereas lesions of the thalamofugal system are still compatible with brightess or simple form discrimination , but affect the performance of more subtle discrimination tasks [Pritz et al, 1970;Hodos and Bonbright, 1974], Although not all of the results of the ablation studies are amenable to an explanation in known electrophysiological terms, an interesting out come of these studies is that the discrimination deficits which follow the combined lesions of nucleus rotundus and nucleus opticus principalis thalami are more severe than those obtained by destruction of the nucleus rotundus alone [Hodos et ai, 1973]. This observation raises the problem of the mutual interplay between the two visual systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the wulst lesion damage was comparable to that which produces modest deficits in visual discrimination tasks and substantial impairments in some learning tasks (Pritz et al ., 1970; Macphail, 1971, 1976; Hodos et al ., 1973; Delius et al ., 1984; Hodos et al ., 1984; Shimizu & Hodos, 1989). Similarly, the ectostriatum lesion damage was comparable to that which produces substantial impairments in visual discrimination tasks carried out in an operant chamber (Bessette & Hodos, 1989; Hodos & Karten, 1970).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%