1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00170.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Efficacy and Effectiveness of Marital and Family Therapy: A Perspective From Meta‐analysis

Abstract: This article reviews the major findings from a multiproject meta‐analysis of the effects of marital and family therapy (MFT). Across 163 randomized trials, MFT demonstrates moderate, statistically significant, and often clinically significant effects. No orientation is yet demonstrably superior to any other, nor is MFT superior to individual therapy. Cost effectiveness information is scant in these 163 studies, but supportive. Randomized experiments yield very different answers from nonrandomized experimental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
97
0
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
97
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive contributions of the therapeutic alliance can be found across theoretical orientations and treatment modalities, e.g. marriage, group, individual and family work (Diamond, Liddle, Hogue, & Dakof, 1999;Rait, 2000;Shadish, Ragsdale, & Glaser, 1995). It has also been found that the alliance remains a strong predictor of outcome regardless of the therapist's fidelity to a particular therapeutic approach (Chatoor & Krupnick, 2001;Luborsky, 2000).…”
Section: Theoretical Orientation and Outcomementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The positive contributions of the therapeutic alliance can be found across theoretical orientations and treatment modalities, e.g. marriage, group, individual and family work (Diamond, Liddle, Hogue, & Dakof, 1999;Rait, 2000;Shadish, Ragsdale, & Glaser, 1995). It has also been found that the alliance remains a strong predictor of outcome regardless of the therapist's fidelity to a particular therapeutic approach (Chatoor & Krupnick, 2001;Luborsky, 2000).…”
Section: Theoretical Orientation and Outcomementioning
confidence: 93%
“…But in contrast to the elaborate and effective practice (e.g. Grawe, Donati, & Bernauer, 1994;Pinsof & Wynne, 1995;Shadish et al, 1995), systemic theory has several limitations, which are described in more detail below.…”
Section: Systemic Family Theorymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Meanwhile, a certain therapeutic approach has been established, which is not only applied successfully to couples and families (e.g. Alexander, Holtzworth-Munroe, & Jameson, 1994;Shadish, Ragsdale, Glaser, & Montgomery, 1995), but also in individual therapy (e.g. de Shazer, 1988;Watzlawick, Weakland & Fisch, 1974).…”
Section: Systemic Family Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers conclude that there are no discernable differences in outcome for different types of couple therapy modalities (Jacobson & Addis, 1993;Shadish, Ragsdale, Glaser, & Montgomery, 1995). Others have argued that couple therapy as a modality has demonstrated differential outcomes (Johnson & Greenberg, 1985;Leff et al, 2000).…”
Section: Couple Therapy and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%