The Efficacy and Medium to Long-Term Follow-Up of Transcatheter Retrograde Closure of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects via the Femoral Artery With Amplatzer Duct Occluder II in Children

Self Cite

BackgroundHeart block is the most common and concerning complication associated with transcatheter device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect (pmVSD) and its occurrence remains a great challenge for device closure.MethodsBetween June 2002 and June 2020, 1076 pediatric patients with pmVSD, who successfully underwent transcatheter device closure in our center, were enrolled in this cohort study, with a median follow-up of 64 months (range: 1 to 19 years).ResultsOf 1076 patients, 234 (21.8%) developed postprocedural heart block, with right bundle branch block being the most common (74.8%), followed by left bundle branch block (16.2%), and atrioventricular block (5.6%). Complete atrioventricular block occurred in 5 cases, including 3 cases with permanent pacemaker implantation, 1 case with recovery to normal sinus rhythm, and 1 case with sudden cardiac death. Most patients (97.9%) developed heart block within 1 week of procedure. Finally, 138 cases returned to normal cardiac conduction. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that thin-waist occluders (odds ratio [OR]: 1.759; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.023 to 3.022; P = 0.041), and oversized devices (OR: 1.809; 95% CI: 1.322 to 2.476; P < 0.001) were independently associated with occurrence of postprocedural heart block. Moreover, heart block was less likely to occur when the left disk of occluder was placed within the aneurysmal tissue (OR: 0.568; 95% CI: 0.348 to 0.928; P = 0.024).ConclusionThe outcome of postprocedural heart block is favorable in most cases. Oversized devices and thin-waist occluders should be avoided. Placement of the left disk of the device should into the aneurysmal tissue is highly recommended.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 75%

Predictors and long-term outcomes of heart block after transcatheter device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect

Jiang

Zhang²,

Zhang³

et al. 2022

Self Cite

“…Compared to anterograde implantation, the retrograde approach improves the control in positioning the right-side disk away from the tricuspid valve ( 10 , 11 ). In addition, both devices are designed with a freely articulating right retention disk that can be well-positioned under TEE monitoring ( 9 – 12 ). One might expect no new-onset of TR and might question why devices were released into position if a TR has been noticed on TEE.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative outcomes of two competitive devices for retrograde closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects

Haddad

Saliba

2023

BackgroundRetrograde closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSDs) is a well-established procedure. However, interventionists are still looking for the best closure device.MethodsWe performed a single-center retrospective review of 5-year-experience (from July 2015 to July 2020) with retrograde closure of pmVSDs using AmplatzerTM Duct Occluder II (ADOII) and KONAR-MF™ VSD occluder (MFO). Deficient sub-aortic rim (SAR) (≤2.5 mm for MFO and ≤3 mm for ADOII) was an exclusion criterion in defects with a diameter ratio (right-side exit/left-side entry) > 0.5.ResultsWe identified 77 patients (57.1% males) with a median age of 4.3 years (IQR, 2.2–8.3) and a median weight of 16 kg (IQR, 11.2–24.5). 44 (57.1%) defects (22.7% with deficient SARs) with a median left-side defect diameter of 8.7 mm (IQR, 5.7–10) were closed with ADOIIs. 33 (42.9%) defects (51.5% with deficient SARs) with a median left-side defect diameter of 10.8 mm (IQR, 8.8–13.5) were closed with MFOs. One 7/5 MFO was removed before release and upsized to a 12/10 MFO. Implantation success rate was 100% with ADOII and 90.9% with MFO devices. Two MFOs were snare-recaptured after embolization, and one 9/7 MFO was snare-retrieved for a new onset of grade-2 aortic regurgitation that persisted afterward. Median follow-up was 3.3 years (IQR, 2.1–4.2) for ADOII and 2.3 years (IQR, 1.7–2.5) for MFO. No permanent heart block or death occurred. Freedom from left ventricular dilation was 94.62% at 36 months of follow-up. Freedom from residual shunt was 90.62% for MFO and 89.61% for ADOII at 24 months of follow-up. One 2.6-year-old patient with baseline mild aortic valve prolapse and trivial aortic regurgitation developed a grade-2 aortic regurgitation after 9/7 MFO implantation. He was treated surgically after two years without device extraction. One new grade-2 asymptomatic tricuspid regurgitation persisted at the last follow-up in the ADOII group.ConclusionsADOII and MFO are complementary devices for effective retrograde closure of pmVSDs in children, including defects with absent or deficient SAR. ADOII is limited to smaller defects but offers a lower profile and a flexible left-side disk for better maneuverability over the aortic valve during retrograde implantation.

“…It can occur more frequently in cases where an inappropriate device is selected, and sometimes determining the exact cause of the block is challenging. Young age, low body weight, presence of ventricular septal aneurysm, selection of excessively large devices, and direct device compression are significant contributing factors ( 24 – 26 ). A meta-analysis of transcatheter device closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defect performed by Santhanam H et al in 2018 showed that the pooled estimate of CAVB is 1.1% (95% CI: 0.5–1.9) ( 19 )..…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For cases presenting aneurysmal tissue, implanting the device within the aneurysmal tissue on the RV side increased the distance between the device and the valve, consequently reducing the potential risk posed to the AoV. New-onset AR has been reported in up to 17% of percutaneously closed pmVSDs ( 24 , 25 ). The development of aortic insufficiency is influenced not only by the type of device and the structure of the defect but also by the operator's experience.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Safety and efficacy of Amplatzer duct occluder II and konar-MF™ VSD occluder in the closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children weighing less than 10 kg

Yildiz,

Narin,

Oksuz

et al. 2023

IntroductionDevice closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects (pmVSD) is a successful off-label treatment alternative. We aim to report and compare the outcomes of pmVSD closure in children weighing less than 10 kg using Amplatzer Duct Occluder II (ADOII) and Konar-MF VSD Occluder (MFO) devices.MethodsRetrospective clinical data review of 52 children with hemodynamically significant pmVSD, and sent for transcatheter closure using ADOII and MFO, between January 2018 and January 2023. Baseline, procedural, and follow-up data were compared according to the implanted deviceResultsADOII devices were implanted in 22 children with a median age of 11 months (IQR, 4.1–14.7) and weight of 7.4 kg (IQR, 2.7–9.7). MFO devices were implanted in 30 children with a median age of 11 months (IQR, 4.8–16.6) and weight of 8 kg (IQR, 4.1–9.6). ADOII were implanted (retrograde, 68.1%) in defects with a median left ventricular diameter of 4.6 mm (IQR, 3.8–5.7) and right ventricular diameter of 3.5 mm (IQR, 3.1–4.9) while MFO were implanted (antegrade, 63.3%) in defects with a median left ventricular diameter of 7 mm (IQR, 5.2–11.3) (p > 0.05) and right ventricular diameter of 5 mm (IQR, 2.0, 3.5–6.2) (p < 0.05). The procedural and fluoroscopy times were shorter with the MFO device (p < 0.05). On a median follow-up of 41.2 months (IQR, 19.7–49.3), valvular insufficiency was not observed. One 13-month-old child (6.3 kg) with ADOII developed a complete atrioventricular heart block (CAVB) six months postoperative and required pacemaker implantation. One 11-month-old child (5.9 kg) with MFO developed a CAVB 3 days postoperative and the device was removed. At 6 months post-procedure, only one child with MFO still experiences a minor residual shunt. There was one arterio-venous fistula that resolved spontaneously.ConclusionBoth the MFO and ADOII are effective closure devices in appropriately selected pmVSDs. CAVB can occur with both devices. The MFO is inherently advantageous for defects larger than 6 mm and subaortic rims smaller than 3 mm. In the literature, our series represents the first study comparing the mid-term outcomes of MFO and ADOII devices in children weighing less than 10 kg.