2008
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.070675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy and safety of intensive statin therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
1
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
86
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Several meta-analyses provide evidence that high-dose statin therapy, as opposed to moderate doses, provides additional protection against cardiovascular events, but not all-cause mortality, in secondary prevention, 85,92,93 but no such benefit has been found in primary prevention. 61 The benefits of exercise extend equally to reductions in CVD and mortality, with a consistent dose response (Table 5). Variable but predictable risk reduction occured in primary care meta-analyses, with estimates ranging from 11% to 57%.…”
Section: Comparing the Benefits Of Drug Or Exercise Interventions Usementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several meta-analyses provide evidence that high-dose statin therapy, as opposed to moderate doses, provides additional protection against cardiovascular events, but not all-cause mortality, in secondary prevention, 85,92,93 but no such benefit has been found in primary prevention. 61 The benefits of exercise extend equally to reductions in CVD and mortality, with a consistent dose response (Table 5). Variable but predictable risk reduction occured in primary care meta-analyses, with estimates ranging from 11% to 57%.…”
Section: Comparing the Benefits Of Drug Or Exercise Interventions Usementioning
confidence: 89%
“…36 The only existing RCT comparing myalgia at high and low doses of statins actually showed no difference. 60 Since there is no clinical trial-based evidence for an additional benefit of high-dose statins against mortality in primary prevention, 61 and since no study has established valid low-density lipoprotein targets, 1 it would seem reasonable to be content with a low dose if a statin is to be used. 3.…”
Section: Mitigation Of Statin Myopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis of seven trials (involving 29,395 patients with CAD) 67 comparing intensive statin therapy with less intensive statin therapy found that more intensive regimens (atorvastatin 80 mg/day or simvastatin 80 mg/day) were associated with higher levels of aminotransferases (1.5% versus 0.4%; OR 4.14; 95% CI 2.30 to 7.44), myalgia (3.3% versus 2.8%; OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.63), myopathy (2.2% versus 1.8%; OR 1.91; 95% CI 0.11 to 32.13) and rhabdomyolysis (0.05% versus 0.04%; OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.29 to 3.24) than less intensive regimens (atorvastatin 10 mg/day, lovastatin 5 mg/ day, pravastatin 40 mg/day, simvastatin 20 mg/ day). Similar observations were reported in a metaanalysis by Silva et al 68 This meta-analysis included four trials (all of which were included in the aforementioned meta-analysis) comprising 27,548 In addition to these meta-analyses several other pooled analyses were identified.…”
Section: Intensive-dose Statinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six months after cardiac catheterization, only half of the participants were taking triple therapy (statin, an antiplatelet agent and an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor), and, although over 80% were taking statins, their dosages were still low relative to the doses in clinical trials. 10,14 As a result, less than half of the participants had attained the guideline-recommended LDL targets. Thus, our inability to show a statistically significant benefit over control cannot merely be attributed to a ceiling effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%