2020
DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2020.1813025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy and safety of transradial and transfemoral approach in treatment of coronary chronic total occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Early observational studies and the more recent ACCOAST study suggested a higher frequency of stroke with TRA, 25 26 though the aforementioned meta-analyses also examined more recent rates of stroke and found no statistical difference. 21 22 23 The data from these analyses, however, were not granular or well powered. Singh et al specifically noted that their study was unable to detect statistically significant differences in stroke incidence, as only half of the included trials reported stroke outcomes and the incidence was quite low (0.48–0.59%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 Early observational studies and the more recent ACCOAST study suggested a higher frequency of stroke with TRA, 25 26 though the aforementioned meta-analyses also examined more recent rates of stroke and found no statistical difference. 21 22 23 The data from these analyses, however, were not granular or well powered. Singh et al specifically noted that their study was unable to detect statistically significant differences in stroke incidence, as only half of the included trials reported stroke outcomes and the incidence was quite low (0.48–0.59%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These studies have consistently demonstrated that TRA is associated with fewer complications such as periprocedural bleeding; decrease in length of hospital stay; improvement of clinical outcomes; and comparable rates of major adverse events. 20 21 22 23 In 2018, the American Heart Association recommended a “radial-first” strategy in the United States for patients with acute coronary syndromes. 24 Early observational studies and the more recent ACCOAST study suggested a higher frequency of stroke with TRA, 25 26 though the aforementioned meta-analyses also examined more recent rates of stroke and found no statistical difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 Recently, the effectiveness and safety of TRA have been reported even in chronic total occlusion (CTO) lesions. 6 However, since the size of radial artery is smaller than femoral artery, one limitation is that the 8Fr sheath cannot be used for insertion. Therefore, the 8Fr sheathless GC system may be useful for procedures that require 8Fr GC such as DCA and intravascular ultrasound guide technique in CTO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The access failure rate is lower in trans-femoral route (2.4%) vs. trans-radial route (7.2%). 13,15 Ideally, trans-radial approach should be taken after performing Allen's test but in daily routine most of the interventional cardiologist take this route just palpating the pulse and assessing the volume of radial artery. An older study conducted by this method on 100 consecutive patients in which their mean age was 53 years and success rate was more than 95%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%