2014
DOI: 10.1177/1474515114537944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy and safety of a chest pain protocol for short stay unit patients: A one year follow-up

Abstract: Patients had a low risk of adverse events 12 months after discharge but substantial continuing health care utilization was observed. Complete assessment by health care professionals prior to discharge may help mitigate representations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For some symptomatic individuals, no underlying pathology or cause can be detected and available treatments are not fully effective for symptom relief. These patients continue to seek treatment from emergency departments and general practice 5,6. Exacerbation of CHD symptoms can occur as a result of depression and anxiety, which are common in people with CHD and associated with poor outcome 7,8.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some symptomatic individuals, no underlying pathology or cause can be detected and available treatments are not fully effective for symptom relief. These patients continue to seek treatment from emergency departments and general practice 5,6. Exacerbation of CHD symptoms can occur as a result of depression and anxiety, which are common in people with CHD and associated with poor outcome 7,8.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…specific age limits [51], AMI on index ED visit [43], too many return ED visits [38], language barriers [50] or a known history of coronary artery disease (CAD) [52]. Even though many of these studies investigated the prevalence of AMI [53][54][55][56][57], only a few did so after a one-year follow-up [58,59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…specific age limits [51], AMI on index ED visit [43], too many return ED visits [38], language barriers [50] or a known history of coronary artery disease (CAD) [52]. Even though many of these studies investigated the prevalence of AMI [53][54][55][56][57], only a few did so after a one-year follow-up [58,59].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%