2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2022.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in foot and ankle surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative clinical studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is our pleasure to thank the team of Dr Blankenhorn for performing the study titled "Tranexamic Acid Utilization in Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Meta-analysis." 6 As a result of a similar analysis we conducted recently, 5 we have some concerns about the results reported and would like to share our opinions.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is our pleasure to thank the team of Dr Blankenhorn for performing the study titled "Tranexamic Acid Utilization in Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Meta-analysis." 6 As a result of a similar analysis we conducted recently, 5 we have some concerns about the results reported and would like to share our opinions.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It remains to be determined whether TXA plays a role in the long-term follow-up. In the end, we invite you to read and provide feedback on our recent meta-analysis 5…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have reviewed Dr Kachooei’s article titled “The Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Clinical Studies.” 3 We appreciate the contribution that their article provides to the topic. Both articles need to be interpreted with caution as there is a limited number of patients who have been studied after receiving TXA perioperatively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We appreciate Dr Kachooei and team’s recommendation to use a different quality assessment tool (GRADE). In their study, 3 Mirghaderi et al also did not use the GRADE assessment tool, but used the same assessment tools that were used in our article. We felt that the assessment tools used in both studies were adequate to assess risk of bias.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%