“…Moreover, two eligible articles were published on the same dataset (Farhangi et al, 2014; Jafarvand et al, 2016), of which the more complete one was included (Farhangi et al, 2014), and the other one was excluded (Jafarvand et al, 2016). After these exclusions, 15 eligible RCTs remained for inclusion in the current systematic review and meta‐analysis (Derosa et al, 2019; Diaz‐Castro et al, 2020; Emami & Bazargani‐Gilani, 2018; Farhangi et al, 2014; Farsi et al, 2016; Gholami et al, 2019; Hernández‐Ojeda et al, 2012; Kuhlman et al, 2019; Mabuchi et al, 2007; Nevzat, 2015; Pek et al, 2016; Rodríguez‐Carrizalez et al, 2016; Serag et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2020; Yasser et al, 2021); Of these, 13 studies assessed serum concentrations of ALT and AST (Derosa et al, 2019; Emami & Bazargani‐Gilani, 2018; Farhangi et al, 2014; Farsi et al, 2016; Kuhlman et al, 2019; Mabuchi et al, 2007; Nevzat, 2015; Pek et al, 2016; Rodríguez‐Carrizalez et al, 2016; Serag et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2020; Yasser et al, 2021), six studies examined serum concentrations of GGT (Emami & Bazargani‐Gilani, 2018; Farsi et al, 2016; Gholami et al, 2019; Hernández‐Ojeda et al, 2012; Nevzat, 2015; Pek et al, 2016), and four studies evaluated serum concentration of ALP following coenzyme Q10 supplementation (Diaz‐Castro et al, 2020; Hernández‐Ojeda et al, 2012; Nevzat, 2015; Pek et al, 2016). The study conducted by Nevzat et al (2015) compared the effects of two doses of coenzyme Q10 supplementation (100 and 200 mg/day) with placed in their study, and also for Emami and Bazargani‐Gilani (2018) study that divided participants into four groups (supplement only, supplement with precooling strategy, and control groups), we extracted two effect sizes from these studies and included them in our meta‐analysis as two separate studies.…”