2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.10.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy in somatoform disorders and medically unexplained physical symptoms: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract:  This study aimed to update the former meta-analyses, and give an overview of the evidence from RCTs that focused on the efficacy of CBT for patients with somatoform disorders and medically unexplained physical symptoms.  It suggested that CBT is effective for somatoform disorders and MUPS by reducing physical symptoms, anxiety symptoms and depressive symptoms, improving physical functioning. The efficacy of CBT on alleviating somatic symptoms, anxiety and depressive symptoms were sustained on follow-up.  T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
4
45
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The prospective study by Kendler et al 23 showed that a high neuroticism level was associated with a high hazard ratio of the onset of major depressive episodes when stressful life events occurred. The meta-analysis by Liu et al 24 also showed that high neuroticism increases the risk of occurrence of depressive symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The prospective study by Kendler et al 23 showed that a high neuroticism level was associated with a high hazard ratio of the onset of major depressive episodes when stressful life events occurred. The meta-analysis by Liu et al 24 also showed that high neuroticism increases the risk of occurrence of depressive symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The subgroups were the treatment form (individual vs. group); mode of delivery (face-to-face vs. remote); use of a diabetes-specific manual (yes vs. no); number of sessions (<10 vs. ≥10); duration of session (<90 min vs. ≥90min); type of DM (T1DM, T2DM, or both); drop-out rate (<20% vs. ≥20%); intervention type (CBT alone vs. CBT combined with other interventions); patients accompanied by mood symptoms (no vs. yes); and treatment used specific components of CBT (no vs. yes). The definition of using components for CBT was based on the Comprehensive Psychotherapeutic Intervention Rating Scale and previous studies (29)(30)(31). The following components of CBT were included in the subgroup analyses: cognitive strategy, behavioral experiment, mood management, stress management, homework assignment, and interpersonal strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, providing treatment of the accompanying psychological distress or mental disorders, tailored to the needs and treatment expectations of the patient. Treatment consisted of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (Liu, Gill, Teodorczuk, Li, & Sun, ), acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) (Barrett‐Naylor & Dawson, ; Cope & Agrawal, ), or problem‐solving treatment (PST) (Malouff, Thorsteinsson, & Schutte, ; Wilkinson & Mynors‐Wallis, ) provided by trained psychologists, in combination with pharmacotherapy provided by a physician or psychiatrist. The psychotherapeutic treatments were provided sequentially and were tailored to the needs and treatment expectations of the patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%