1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.1999.00176.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy of emamectin benzoate as an oral treatment of sea lice, Lepeophtheirus salmonis (KrÒyer), infestations in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.

Abstract: The efficacy of emamectin benzoate as an oral treatment of sea lice, Lepeophtheirus salmonis (KrÒyer), infestations in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., was evaluated in a dose titration study and two dose confirmation studies. Replicated groups of salmon with induced infestations of sea lice were given emamectin benzoate on pelleted feed at doses of 0, 25, 50 and 100 μg kg−1 biomass day−1 for seven consecutive days. Sea lice were counted at 7, 14 and 21 days from the start of treatment, and comparisons made wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
75
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
75
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduced sensitivity to EB could potentially be an issue (Igboeli et al 2012), but the skin concentration of EB was much higher than the level typically obtained by oral administration (Skilbrei et al 2008). The treatment efficacy (sensu Stone et al 2000) of 42.7% observed in the present study was also within the ranges of 30−60% that could be expected after a week of oral treatment (Stone et al 1999(Stone et al , 2000. The salinity was not measured at the experiment cage location, but as discussed above (in 'Infestation, swimming depth and distance to the river outlet'), we can reasonably assume that there was a low-salinity layer extending at least 1−2 m downwards.…”
Section: Treatment Effects On Infestationsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reduced sensitivity to EB could potentially be an issue (Igboeli et al 2012), but the skin concentration of EB was much higher than the level typically obtained by oral administration (Skilbrei et al 2008). The treatment efficacy (sensu Stone et al 2000) of 42.7% observed in the present study was also within the ranges of 30−60% that could be expected after a week of oral treatment (Stone et al 1999(Stone et al , 2000. The salinity was not measured at the experiment cage location, but as discussed above (in 'Infestation, swimming depth and distance to the river outlet'), we can reasonably assume that there was a low-salinity layer extending at least 1−2 m downwards.…”
Section: Treatment Effects On Infestationsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…2b). Thus, the EB treatment effect was a 31.6% intensity reduction over the experiment duration of 8 d. The treatment efficacy (sensu Stone et al 1999Stone et al , 2000 was 42.7%. The decline in intensity was statistically significant in both groups, and treatment and initial intensity had significant negative effects on infestation growth (model r~ Treatment + Initial intensity, p Intercept < 0.001, p Treatment < 0.001, p Initial intensity = 0.025, adj.…”
Section: Infestation Development In Caged Troutmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficacy of emamectin benzoate (50 µg kg -1 for 7 d) has been demonstrated against the parasitic copepods Lepeophtheirus salmonis and Caligus elongatus on Atlantic salmon Salmo salar (Stone et al 1999, 2000a,b,c, Treasurer et al 2002, and Salmincola edwardsii on brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis (Duston & Cusak 2002). Stone et al (2000a) ascertained that the duration of efficacy against L. salmonis on salmon was up to 10 wk.…”
Section: Abstract: Emamectin Benzoate · Slice · Argulus Coregoni · Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…first summer in sea cages). Emamectin, another oral formulation in the avermectin family, is currently being used through emergency drug release (EDR) but was not available at the time this trial was conducted (Stone et al 1999, Armstrong et al 2000.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%