1981
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9924(81)90013-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy of gestural cueing in dysphasic word-retrieval responses

Abstract: The effectiveness of visual--gestural cueing as compared with traditional auditory--verbal cueing was investigated using a time-series design. Eight dysphasic adults equally divided into a control and an experimental group were the subjects for this study. Results indicated no significant improvement in response times after an intensive 2-wk treatment period. Similarly, no single cue was observed to be more effective than others in eliciting dysphasic word-retrieval responses. In contrast, there was a signific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For people with dysphasia, the type of cueing, whether visual-gestural or auditory-verbal, appears to not be as significant as the order in which cues are presented. Regardless of cue type, the cue presented first is often the most effective (Drummond & Rentschler, 1981). Frequent prompts delivered unobtrusively to adults with severe intellectual disability through a small pocket device with an earpiece fostered a higher level of on-task behavior and correct task response (Lancioni, Dijkstra, O'Reilly, Groeneweg, & Van den Hof, 2000), and a combination of favorite songs and verbal prompts can add to fluency of performance and reduce time required in self-help tasks of people with multiple disabilities (Lancioni, O'Reilly, & Campodonico, 2002).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For people with dysphasia, the type of cueing, whether visual-gestural or auditory-verbal, appears to not be as significant as the order in which cues are presented. Regardless of cue type, the cue presented first is often the most effective (Drummond & Rentschler, 1981). Frequent prompts delivered unobtrusively to adults with severe intellectual disability through a small pocket device with an earpiece fostered a higher level of on-task behavior and correct task response (Lancioni, Dijkstra, O'Reilly, Groeneweg, & Van den Hof, 2000), and a combination of favorite songs and verbal prompts can add to fluency of performance and reduce time required in self-help tasks of people with multiple disabilities (Lancioni, O'Reilly, & Campodonico, 2002).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%