Background. Hepatitis B infection is associated with chronic liver disease with high morbidity. Complications of acute infection include severe acute hepatitis or fulminant liver failure. The purpose of this review is to determine the efficacy of nucleoside analog (lamivudine versus entecavir) compared to placebo or no intervention for treating acute primary HBV infection.
Methods. The PRISMA statement criteria were followed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized studies that evaluated the outcomes of Nucleoside Analog (NA) therapy (Lamivudine or Entecavir) in acute hepatitis B infection were included. The following outcomes were considered: virological cure (PCR negative), elimination of acute infection (seroconversion of HBsAg), mortality, and serious adverse events. Searching of databases (Pubmed, Embase) until may 2023 was performed. A meta-analysis for drug intervention was performed, following a fixed-effect model. Subgroup analysis of trials with high risk of bias compared to trials with low risk of bias was assessed using Chi2 test for subgroup differences. Heterogeneity was assessed calculating the Chi2 statistic for heterogeneity.
Results. The initial search identified 4870 references Finally, five trials with 627 adult participants were included. None of the trials included patients with fulminant acute liver failure. The inclusion criterion for patients of these trials was severe acute hepatitis B defined by biochemical and serologic parameters. In 5 trials Lamivudine was compared with placebo or standard-of-care, and only one trial compared three arms: entecavir, lamivudine, and placebo. The certainty of the evidence was low for all outcomes. Virological cure does not favours any intervention: OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.7 (p=0.90), I2=58%. Seroconversion of HBsAg to negative favours placebo/standard-of-care compared to lamivudine: OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.9 (p=0.02), I2=31%. Subgroup analysis excluding trials with high risk of bias had no impact on the seroconversion of HBsAg. The only trial that compared entecavir and lamivudine in terms of seroconversion of HBsAg favored entecavir over lamivudine (OR:3.64, 95% CI 1.31-10.13; 90 participants) but entecavir was not favored compared to standard-of-care (OR:1.71, 95% CI 0.67-4.38). Adverse events were mild and none of the patients stopped therapy or discontinued normal daily activities.
Conclusion. The results suggest that there is insufficient evidence that both NA obtain superior results in terms of efficacy compared with placebo/standard-of-care in patients with acute viral hepatitis. No benefit has been reported with NA based on low quality evidence.