The efficacy of selected probiotic and prebiotic combinations in reducing Campylobacter colonization in broiler chickens

Arsi, Komala; Donoghue, Annie; Woo-Ming, A.; Blore, P. J.; Donoghue, Dan

doi:10.3382/japr/pfv032

Cited by 59 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It should be noted that this is not a practical route of administration in a commercial setting and thus only demonstrates a need for probiotic survival to demonstrate proof of concept for product efficacy. The results of this trial are supported by the work of Arsi et al [18], who reported that certain isolates of Bacillus spp. and Lactobacillus spp.…”

Section: Poultrysupporting

confidence: 80%

“…reduced Campylobacter colonization in vitro by 1 to 2 log. However, when tested in vivo, these same isolates were ineffective in reducing Campylobacter populations, demonstrating the inconsistency of probiotic intervention with pathogen colonization of poultry [18]. However, an in vitro evaluation of Bacillus spp.…”

Section: Poultrymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As noted in Reference [43], the concept of CE specifically originated with the application of mature broiler gastrointestinal contents for the reduction of Salmonella [44]. While addition of DFMs to mature animals yields mixed and often negative results, their administration to livestock early in life (as early as the day of hatch in broilers) has been shown to be effective in reducing pathogenic bacterial loads by kick-starting the natural succession of commensal bacterial colonization of the gastrointestinal microflora [18]. In addition to the direct addition of probiotics to neonatal diets, passive immunity may also be conveyed to the neonate through supplementation of the dam before birth [45].…”

Section: Probiotics/direct-fed Microbials (Dfms)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most commonly, Campylobacter has been linked to poultry products and linked to human cases of gastroenteritis in most cases as well as the Guillain-Barré syndrome, reactive arthritis, and irritable bowel syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease in the most severe cases [16,17]. Campylobacter is a major concern for infection in poultry production [16][17][18]. One route of contamination, also common to most other pathogens, is through livestock water sources [19].…”

Section: Campylobactermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Fructooligosaccharides (FOSs) and mannan-oligosaccharides (MOSs) have been evaluated for oral administration in broiler chickens in hopes of reducing the colonization of C. jejuni [7,8,18]. When used in isolation, neither of these substances was effective in reducing pathogen colonization in broiler chicks.…”

Section: Prebioticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Prebiotic and Probiotic Approaches to Improving Food Safety on the Farm and Their Implications on Human Health

Smith¹,

Callaway²,

Tedeschi³

et al. 2016

Probiotics and Prebiotics in Human Nutrition and Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Human health is a broad category that encompasses the entirety of the food production system. Livestock production practices have important effects on human health because livestock not only are a primary food source but also can be the source of pathogenic bacteria that may enter the food chain indirectly. As government regulation and public scrutiny restrict the prophylactic use of antibiotic and antimicrobial interventions, other techniques must be used to reduce the burden of animal-borne pathogenic bacteria entering the food system. Prebiotics (isolated compounds that enhance natural microflora and thereby decrease pathogens) and probiotics (live microbes that are administered to livestock to enhance microbial diversity and crowd out pathogens) represent two unique opportunities for alternative measures in pathogen reduction. This review addresses the link between animal production and human health, the agricultural sources of pathogenic organisms, and the probiotic and prebiotic approaches that have been evaluated in an effort to reduce carriage of foodborne pathogenic bacteria by livestock.Keywords: food safety, livestock, prebiotic, preharvest intervention, probiotic 1 Proprietary brand names are necessary to report factually on available data; however, the USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of the product, and the use of the name by the USDA implies no approval of the product and/or exclusion of others that may be suitable.

show abstract

Section: Poultrysupporting

confidence: 80%

Section: Poultrymentioning

confidence: 99%