Traditional hypochlorites have been used to manage local wound infection since their introduction in the early 1900s 1 . Traditional hypochlorite solutions are those that have a high pH varying from 7.5 to 11.8 2-5 . In contrast, recently developed hypochlorite solutions are pH-neutral, making them more appropriate for application to healing wound tissue. Level 5 bench research has demonstrated that traditional hypochlorite solutions have anti-bacterial properties; 6-8 however, the effect may be short-lived 9 . Although Level 5 bench research has suggested that traditional hypochlorite solutions are toxic to cells and may delay wound healing, 6,8,10,11 Level 1 and 2 evidence 2, 12-16 showed that acceptable healing outcomes can be achieved using traditional hypochlorite solutions, with one study demonstrating superior outcomes compared to an inert solution. 17 Level 1 and 4 evidence 12,13,[16][17][18][19][20] indicated that traditional hypochlorite solutions are associated with reduction in signs and symptoms of local wound infection. Level 1 and 2 evidence 13,14,16 showed that topical phenytoin 13,16 , honey 14 and nanocrystalline silver gel 16 achieved better outcomes than a traditional hypochlorite solution, and these options could be considered in settings with access. The risk of delaying healing of the wound should be considered in the context of managing local wound infection and reducing the risk of spreading and systemic infection, when alternative less cytotoxic antiseptics are not available in the setting.
CLINICAL PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONSAll recommendations should be applied with consideration to the wound, the person, the health professional and the clinical context.Traditional hypochlorite solutions could be applied to infected wounds in low resource settings in which less cytotoxic antiseptic solutions are not accessible (Grade B).