2017
DOI: 10.1111/iej.12870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficacy of supplementary sonic irrigation using the EndoActivator®system determined by removal of a collagen film from anex vivomodel

Abstract: Supplementary sonic irrigation using the EndoActivator system was significantly more effective in removing stained collagen from the canal surface than syringe irrigation alone. EndoActivator used with large tip (size 35, .04 taper) and high power setting in size 40, .08 taper canals was more effective than other combinations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Bryce et al . ). Sonic devices work similarly, but generally use flexible tips and operate at lower frequencies (<20 kHz).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…, Bryce et al . ). Sonic devices work similarly, but generally use flexible tips and operate at lower frequencies (<20 kHz).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, Bryce et al . ); however, ultrasonic activation has been reported to be superior regarding penetration to working length and into lateral canals (de Gregorio et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of note, the use of 35/.04 tips at high power setting was found to be more effective than other combinations in removing stained collagen from the canal surface and this result was attributed to increased energy applied to the irrigant as a result of greater tip rigidity. 20 Several methods have been used to mimic periapical tissue resistance during irrigant extrusion in vitro. Although periapical tissues may act as a natural barrier to prevent apical extrusion in vivo, several studies have neglected the possible effect of periapical tissues by evaluating extrusion into vials full of air.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%