The Efficacy of Two Organizational Plans for Underachieving Intellectually Gifted Children

Karnes, Merle B.; McCoy, George F.; Zehrbach, R. Reid; Wollersheim, Janet P.; Clarizio, Harvey F.

doi:10.1177/001440296302900904

Cited by 14 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Research foci were wide and varied, but remained essentially diagnostic when gifted underachievement was examined. Behavioral psychology guided research design, and areas such as motivation, frustration, family relations, home backgrounds, mental health, and personality differences drove inquiry (Bachtold, 1969;Baymur & Patterson, 1960;Dunn, 1963;Durr & Collier, 1960;Gallagher & Rogge, 1966;Karnes, McCoy, Zehrbach, Wollersheim, & Clarizio, 1963;McGillivray, 1964;Morrow & Wilson, 1961;Perkins, 1965Perkins, , 1969Pierce & Bowman, 1960, pp. 33-66;Purkey, 1969;Raph, Goldberg, & Passow, 1966;Shaw & Black, 1960;Shaw & McCuen, 1960;Shouksmith & Taylor, 1964;Tetrault, 1965).…”

Section: A Shot Into Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Changes in situated practice and classroom action are typ-Historically, underachieving gifted students in the classroom have been viewed as defective merchandise in need of repair. Research has been conducted to learn how these children deviate from their peers, and strategies have been postulated to rehabilitate them (Bachtold, 1969;Baymur & Patterson, 1960;Brophy, 1982;Dunn, 1963;Durr & Collier, 1960;Gallagher & Rogge, 1966;Gowan, 1957;Karnes et al, 1963;Kimball, 1953;Kurtz & Swenson, 1951;McGillivray, 1964;Morgan, 1952;Morrow & Wilson, 1961;Passow & Goldberg, 1958;Perkins, 1965Perkins, ,1969Pierce & Bowman, 1960, pp. 33-66;Purkey, 1969;Raph et al, 1966;Rust & Ryan, 1953;Shaw & Black, 1960;Shaw & McCuen, 1960;Shouksmith & Taylor, 1964;Tetrault, 1965).…”

Section: In Retrospectmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Understanding Giftedness and Underachievement: At the Edge of Possibility

Schultz

2002

Gifted Child Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although many ways of doing research exist in education, mulch of the research conducted has focused on identifying or defining strategies to fit learners to existing theories of education and schooling. This article examines historical styles of research Conducted around the construct of gifted underachievement. It then explores possibilities of implementing alternative approaches and theoretical arguments in practical applications in this area. Goals include providing an overview of research focused on gifted underachievement, examining research positions (paradigms) that more vividly represent complexity inherent in educating gifted individuals, and providing precepts that guide practitioners and scholars to alternative views of the research process and use of research outcomes.

show abstract

Section: A Shot Into Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: In Retrospectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding Giftedness and Underachievement: At the Edge of Possibility

Schultz

2002

Gifted Child Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This term obviously covers a tremendous range of activities, and it is hardly likely that one will find positive results for the application of everything that is so labeled. Karnes and others (1963) reported a unique program for dealing with gifted underachievers. Instead of using the usual counseling approach, they varied the intellectual environment surrounding the underachiever.…”

Section: Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Gifted

Gallagher¹,

Rogge²

1966

Review of Educational Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Additional References: Drews (1965); Ferguson (1963); Fritz (1963); Goldsmith (1965); Gowan and Demos (1965); Harrison (1963); ; Karnes and others (1963); Klausmeier (1963a, b; 1964); Manchester and Silberberg (1963); Wiener and O'Shea (1963).…”

Section: Special Programsmentioning

confidence: 99%