2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficiency of public services in small municipalities: The case of drinking water supply

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
20
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Refs [15][16][17][18][19] provide a detailed literature review on the topic of efficiency in water resource management. Moreover, some studies are also focused on Spain [20][21][22][23][24][25]. The inefficiencies associated with restrictions on the use of water, investments, and current price agreements lead to problems connected to the deterioration of water quality and the infrastructures, and the increase in access costs [16] affecting the citizens' well-being.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refs [15][16][17][18][19] provide a detailed literature review on the topic of efficiency in water resource management. Moreover, some studies are also focused on Spain [20][21][22][23][24][25]. The inefficiencies associated with restrictions on the use of water, investments, and current price agreements lead to problems connected to the deterioration of water quality and the infrastructures, and the increase in access costs [16] affecting the citizens' well-being.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improve the efficiency of public service [ 19 ] through this algorithm in Figure 9 .where ABC is the regression coefficient.…”
Section: Analysis On the Present Situation Of Urban Sports Public Servicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have used complex variants of the DEA, such as super-efficiency (e.g., to investigate the potential for efficiency improvement [4]), DEA-scale efficiency (e.g., to examine the efficiency of leakage-management [14]); DEA model with statistical tolerance (e.g., to assess the efficiency of water and sewerage companies (WaSCs) [38]); shared input data envelopment analysis model (e.g., to separately measure the efficiency when the same operator delivers more than one service, as water and wastewater services [39]); the directional metadistance function (e.g., to revisit the relationship between ownership and performance [13]; Bootstrap DEA (e.g., to identify the determinants of efficiency of water provision services [40,41] or to evaluate the influence of the management nature (private vs. public) on efficiency [10]); DEA double bootstrap (e.g., to overcome the limitation of deterministic method that does not allow identifying environmental factors influencing efficiency scores [42]); the DEA-based approach on Directional Distance Function (DDF) (e.g., to measure the performance of the integrated production of desirable and undesirable outputs [43]); or Network DEA models (e.g., to overcome the shortcomings of the standard AED for relative performance assessment (which do not allow setting clear guidelines for improvement) [44]).…”
Section: Literature Analysing Efficiency and Productivity In Water Supply: Dea Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%