The Efficiency Test of Additional Multi Protocol Label Switching Network Protocol Over Open Shortest Path First Network Using Graphic Network Simulator 3

Widi, Ghandie Kurnia; Baihaqi, Muhammad Luthfi; Nugroho, Ari Sriyanto; Hidayat, Sidiq Syamsul

doi:10.11591/telkomnika.v15i1.7600

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A algorithm of physical topology discovery based on spanning tree protocol is given in the Ref. [6,7], but most of the network providers will not regularly provide the root information of spanning tree, which is not different from the bridges information [8].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Algorithm of Physical Network Topology Discovery in Multi-VLANs

2016

TELKOMNIKA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The most recent physical topology discovery knowledge of the Ethernet network is the key to network management tasks. Virtual LANs (VLANs) IntroductionNetwork topology is the methods and forms of the connection between the nodes in the network. Network topology discovery is important for the establishment of network simulation model and the network performance measurements and server location and fault analysis, is the basic premise of effective network management, is also a important scale to measure the success or failure of the business network management system.A physical LAN according to the different rules is logically divided into different subnets by VLAN (Virtual Local Area Network), the subnets are in different broadcast domain, and are not limited by physical location. In actual network, VLAN technology is widely used. A switch may have more than one VLAN in running network, so when switches interconnected, that need to transfer more than one VLAN information. But the 802.1Q of each manufacturer is not the same, so often there are some problems for interconnection. In addition, core routers and backbone switch and the secondary node switches and so on, due to some reasons such as management and security, the management IP address and the IP address of the cascade user or device are not in the same VLAN.Layer-2 network topology discovery involves network layer devices, namely layer-2 switch. Since they are devices based on the data link layer, so using the traditional TCP/IP approach is difficult to find the connection between them. The main network management tool developers at home and abroad have added layer-2 topology discovery into their products. However, these tools are based on the related products of manufacturer without generality. For these reasons, we propose the algorithm to automatically discover the physical network topology across multi-VLANs and apply to network devices from different manufactures [1,2].

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

An Algorithm of Physical Network Topology Discovery in Multi-VLANs

2016

TELKOMNIKA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is not cost effective to directly implement these high speed networks. Thus, there is a need to provide a new measure to operate these applications whilst preserving the need for minimal end-to-end delay at no additional network enhancement costs [1]. For example, video applications usually require an end-to-end delay of less than 250ms.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Performance of MPLS-based Virtual Private Networks and Classic Virtual Private Networks Using Advanced Metrics

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) is effective in managing and utilizing available network bandwidth. It has advanced security features and a lower time delay. The existing literature has covered the performance of MPLS-based networks in relation to conventional Internet Protocol (IP) networks. But, too few literatures exist on the performance of MPLS-based Virtual Private Networks (VPN) in relation to traditional VPN networks. In this paper, a comparison is made between the effectiveness of the MPLS-VPN network and a classic VPN network using simulation studies done on OPNET ® . The performance metrics used to carry out the comparison include; End to End Delay, Voice Packet Sent/Received and Label Switched Path's Traffic. The simulation study was carried out with Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) as the test bed. The result of the study showed that MPLS-based VPN networks outperform classic VPN networks.

show abstract