2007
DOI: 10.1080/10293523.2007.11082489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The efficient market hypothesis: Evidence from ten African stock markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
39
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
39
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in a study conducted on the influence of political news events on share market activity, van der Merwe and Smit (1997) found South African political news events explained 1% to 23% of movement in share prices. These findings were consistent with the findings of Mlambo and Biekpe (2007), who tested the EMH and found inefficiencies using evidence from ten African stock markets.…”
Section: Theory and Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similarly, in a study conducted on the influence of political news events on share market activity, van der Merwe and Smit (1997) found South African political news events explained 1% to 23% of movement in share prices. These findings were consistent with the findings of Mlambo and Biekpe (2007), who tested the EMH and found inefficiencies using evidence from ten African stock markets.…”
Section: Theory and Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A number of academics support this approach e.g. Bowie (1994) and Mlambo and Biekpe (2007). This approach is however, not expected to remove 5 The adjusted trade-to-trade returns are calculate as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered to be a linear test and it can also detect non-linearity in a returns series, although the results differ from the linear test. Moreover, this test is not affected by any extreme values in the return series, therefore, it does not require constant variance of the data (Mlambo and Biekpe, 2007). It serves as a good complement to the serial correlation test, because, while serial correlation coefficients may be significantly affected by a single outlier, the results from the runs test are not seriously affected by a few outliers.…”
Section: Runs Test the Null Hypotheses For The Runs Test Arementioning
confidence: 99%