1936
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.6407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The eggs of mammals, by Gregory Pincus ...

Abstract: The hving egg was neglected presumably because no technique was developed for preserving it intact in vitro long enough for any extensive experimentation to be performed. Nor did the possibility of experimental manipulation of ova in vivo receive more than passing attention (see Grusdew, 1896; Novak and Eisinger, 1923). Since the pubhcation of Stockard and Papanicolou's (1917) and Long and Evans' (1922) exhaustive accounts of the oestrus cycle of the guinea pig and rat respectively, a new era in the study of s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1949
1949
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It would seem more likely, however, that the oestrogen secreted by the follicle-bearing tissue caused the ova to be expelled from the tubes and also from the uterus, as was found to occur in the present experiments. A similar explanation probably accounted for the great variability in the rate of ovum transport in ovariectomized rabbits [Adams, 1958], in rabbits treated with oestrogen [Pincus & Kirsch, 1936;Whitney & Burdick, 1938], and in ovariectomized mice treated with oestrogen [Whitney & Burdick, 1936]. The rather consistent failure to recover between 20 and 30 % of the ova transferred into the tubes of the animals in the present experiment is considered to be due not only to the technical difficulties encountered in recovering ova, but in part to expulsion of ova from the ostium of the tube.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It would seem more likely, however, that the oestrogen secreted by the follicle-bearing tissue caused the ova to be expelled from the tubes and also from the uterus, as was found to occur in the present experiments. A similar explanation probably accounted for the great variability in the rate of ovum transport in ovariectomized rabbits [Adams, 1958], in rabbits treated with oestrogen [Pincus & Kirsch, 1936;Whitney & Burdick, 1938], and in ovariectomized mice treated with oestrogen [Whitney & Burdick, 1936]. The rather consistent failure to recover between 20 and 30 % of the ova transferred into the tubes of the animals in the present experiment is considered to be due not only to the technical difficulties encountered in recovering ova, but in part to expulsion of ova from the ostium of the tube.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These larger doses thus interfered with implantation after the ova had arrived in the uterus. That this interference with implantation is not due to a direct toxic effect of oestrogen on the ova was shown by Burdick, Whitney & Pincus [1937] and by Pincus & Kirsch [1936]. Disturbance of implantation may be due to an interference with maintenance of a progestational endometrium [Segal & Nelson, 1958], but the evidence available [Hain, 1935 ;Huggett & Pritchard, 1945] is not sufficient to determine the mechanism.…”
Section: Effect Of Oestronementioning
confidence: 93%
“…DMARDs suppress the in¯ammatory process and may slow the progression of joint erosion progression and reduce the possibility of functional disability if given at an early stage of the disease (11±14). The choice of DMARD depends on a balance of effectiveness and toxicity (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%