2015
DOI: 10.1144/sp432.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Egiin Davaa prehistoric rupture, central Mongolia: a large magnitude normal faulting earthquake on a reactivated fault with little cumulative slip located in a slowly deforming intraplate setting

Abstract: Abstract:The prehistoric Egiin Davaa earthquake rupture is well-preserved in late Quaternary deposits within the Hangay Mountains of central Mongolia. The rupture is expressed by a semicontinuous 80 km-long topographic scarp. Geomorphological reconstructions reveal a relatively constant scarp height of 4 -4.5 m and a NW-directed slip vector. Previous researchers have suggested that the scarp's exceptional geomorphological preservation indicates that it may correspond to an earthquake that occurred in the regio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1897 M w 8.1 Assam earthquake, India, is also thought to have involved slip of 11–25 m of slip on a fault 110 km in length [ Bilham and England , ]. Well‐constrained prehistoric examples also exist, for example, the ∼4 ka Egiin Davaa paleo‐earthquake rupture in Mongolia, which involved almost uniform slip of ∼8 m along an 80 km length [ Walker et al , ]. These examples are all from intraplate regions, where the seismogenic thickness may be larger than typical, and the large slip at Lepsy may be related to the structural immaturity of the fault, which appears to be a major factor in controlling the magnitude of slip in an earthquake, with “immature” faults tending to fail in shorter though more energetic ruptures [ Manighetti et al , ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 1897 M w 8.1 Assam earthquake, India, is also thought to have involved slip of 11–25 m of slip on a fault 110 km in length [ Bilham and England , ]. Well‐constrained prehistoric examples also exist, for example, the ∼4 ka Egiin Davaa paleo‐earthquake rupture in Mongolia, which involved almost uniform slip of ∼8 m along an 80 km length [ Walker et al , ]. These examples are all from intraplate regions, where the seismogenic thickness may be larger than typical, and the large slip at Lepsy may be related to the structural immaturity of the fault, which appears to be a major factor in controlling the magnitude of slip in an earthquake, with “immature” faults tending to fail in shorter though more energetic ruptures [ Manighetti et al , ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While further painstaking work scouring satellite imagery and checking sites in the field can and will improve our knowledge of active faults (e.g. Walker et al, 2015), many faults will only be discovered when they fail in earthquakes. For example, the faults that caused the M6.5…”
Section: Seismic Hazard In the Continentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In intact, isotropic rocks, normal border faults would strike perpendicular to the least principal stress and dip 60°. Frictionally weak and/or low cohesive strength caused by preexisting structures can, however, localize strain and provide surfaces for fault reactivation (e.g., Bellahsen et al, ; Walker et al, ; Worthington & Walsh, ), including structures that are not ideally oriented in the current stress field (e.g., Ebinger et al, ). Therefore, preexisting structures formed in both current and previous deformation phases can have a fundamental influence on rift geometry (e.g., Phillips et al, ; Whipp et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%