1997
DOI: 10.2307/2951842
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Ehrhart Polynomial of a Lattice Polytope

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Annals of Mathematics is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Annals of Mathematics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In higher dimensions, the coefficient formulas similar to (17) have been given in [3,4]; and one can apply those coefficient formulas to an n-dimensional lattice simplex to obtain Zagier's reciprocity law of higher dimensional Dedekind sums; see [10,20]. However, I would like to mention another proof given by Beck [1] for the reciprocity law of Dedekind sums, using the generating functions of Ehrhart polynomials of [5]. Finally, it should be pointed out that the idea to realize the reciprocity law of Dedekind sums by a lattice simplex is from the work of Diaz and Robins [5], Kantor and Khovanskii [11], Pommersheim [15], though they employed more advanced tools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In higher dimensions, the coefficient formulas similar to (17) have been given in [3,4]; and one can apply those coefficient formulas to an n-dimensional lattice simplex to obtain Zagier's reciprocity law of higher dimensional Dedekind sums; see [10,20]. However, I would like to mention another proof given by Beck [1] for the reciprocity law of Dedekind sums, using the generating functions of Ehrhart polynomials of [5]. Finally, it should be pointed out that the idea to realize the reciprocity law of Dedekind sums by a lattice simplex is from the work of Diaz and Robins [5], Kantor and Khovanskii [11], Pommersheim [15], though they employed more advanced tools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, I would like to mention another proof given by Beck [1] for the reciprocity law of Dedekind sums, using the generating functions of Ehrhart polynomials of [5]. Finally, it should be pointed out that the idea to realize the reciprocity law of Dedekind sums by a lattice simplex is from the work of Diaz and Robins [5], Kantor and Khovanskii [11], Pommersheim [15], though they employed more advanced tools.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the second leading coefficient admits a simple geometric interpretation as normalized surface area of P which we present in detail in (4.1). All other coefficients G i (P ), 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 2, have no such direct geometric meaning, except for special classes of polytopes (cf., e.g., [3,6,12,19,25,26,27,28,32]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the work of [16] used the Bott theorem of differential geometry to express these coefficients in terms of rational functions on Grassmanians; [3] and [11] used the RiemannRoch theorem of algebraic geometry to relate the Todd class and the Chern class of toric variety to express these coefficients in terms of Dedekind sums and cotangent functions; and the work of [2] used the technique of deformation for simple-polytopes and a combinatorial version of the Riemann-Roch theorem. The work of [8] is to express the generating functions of the sequences L(σ, m) and L(σ 0 , m) in terms of hyperbolic cotangent functions for a lattice simplex σ, whose vertices are the column vectors of a lower triangular matrix plus the origin. These generating functions are important because the coefficients of Ehrhart polynomials can be easily computed from their explicit expressions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These generating functions are important because the coefficients of Ehrhart polynomials can be easily computed from their explicit expressions. The method of [8] is analytic, using the Poisson summation and the Fourier analysis, and involves some lengthy estimations. It seems that it is still an open problem to find a general formula with geometric interpretation for the coefficients of Ehrhart polynomials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%