2016
DOI: 10.1515/sgem-2016-0025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The elastic undrained modulus Eu50 for stiff consolidated clays related to the concept of stress history and normalized soil properties

Abstract: Abstract:The paper presents the results of a triaxial test conducted on stiff, consolidated clays. The standard TXCIU procedure (isotropic consolidation and undrained shearing) was applied in the laboratory soil tests. The undrained elastic modulus E u50 was determined from each test.The E u50 values were determined for soil samples cut out from different depths and tested under different confining pressures. There was a significant scatter of values with depth, and no relationships between E u50 modules or ot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is constant, the effective vertical stress being 0.83 (this value appears to be coherent with values reported in [41]). Evaluating ′ v0 at different depths, a c u value corresponding to this depth can be calculated, so introducing a linear variation with depth; being E u depending on c u , a variation of Young's modulus is consequently considered.…”
Section: Definition Of Materials and Interface Parameters For The Numesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…is constant, the effective vertical stress being 0.83 (this value appears to be coherent with values reported in [41]). Evaluating ′ v0 at different depths, a c u value corresponding to this depth can be calculated, so introducing a linear variation with depth; being E u depending on c u , a variation of Young's modulus is consequently considered.…”
Section: Definition Of Materials and Interface Parameters For The Numesupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The procedure followed for the calculation of the critical strain limit ε c , where (a) specimen‐scale, (b) pixel‐scale (which depends on strain resolution), and (c) grain‐scale. 1 Stacey (), 2 Diederichs (), 3 Shirole et al (), 4 Sharma and Verma (), 5l Tang et al (), 6 Prat et al (), and 7 Stróżyk and Tankiewicz ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From stress–strain graph, E u50 parameter was obtained and was considered as the elastic modulus (Figure 3). 30 …”
Section: Test Procedures and Apparatusesmentioning
confidence: 99%