1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8489.1982.tb00413.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Elasticity of Aggregate Australian Agricultural Supply: Estimates and Policy Implications

Abstract: Annual time series data for the period 1950-51 through 1975-76 are used to estimate the price elasticity of aggregate Australian agricultural supply using two methods. The short-run elasticity is estimated to be highly inelastic but it has been increasing through time. The preferred estimate of the tong-run elasticity is in the relatively inelastic range and it has also been increasing through time. Some implications of these results f o r intersectoral resource flows and compensatory assistance, the cost-pric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third and fourth shift variables are a simple time trend and a quadratic time trend variable respectively. The time trend variables are frequently included in agricultural supply response studies to capture the effect of technology changes, for example see Sharma (1997) and Pandey, Piggott and MacAulay (1982), but they also capture any unspecified non-technological effects.…”
Section: Estimating the Tobacco Supply R Esponsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third and fourth shift variables are a simple time trend and a quadratic time trend variable respectively. The time trend variables are frequently included in agricultural supply response studies to capture the effect of technology changes, for example see Sharma (1997) and Pandey, Piggott and MacAulay (1982), but they also capture any unspecified non-technological effects.…”
Section: Estimating the Tobacco Supply R Esponsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alleged fixity of agricultural inputs in the aggregate provided the intuitive explanation for this hypothesis (Cochrane, 1955). The estimated aggregate agricultural supply elasticities obtained from conventional supply functions fitted to time series data have supported the inelastic hypothesis, most falling in the range of 0.1 to 0.4 (Griliches, 1960;Tweeten and Quance, 1969;Van den Noort, 1969;Herdt, 1970;Pandey et al, 1982;LaFrance and Burt, 1983).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the study performed by Yuan, 2011, the analysis of variation in agricultural inputs and outputs and their relations in Hebei Province of China was investigated using Cobb-Douglas production function. The elasticity indexes in the Cobb-Douglas function is in detail described in the article written by Pandey et al, 1982, in which the annual time series data for the period 1950-76 are used to estimate the price elasticity of aggregate Australian agricultural supply. In the paper written by Vanzetti and Quiggin, 1985, the investment analysis is identified at the microeconomic level, by considering the basis of individual decisions, and tested empirically at the aggregate level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%