1996
DOI: 10.1109/19.481315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electrical conductivities of steel and other candidate materials for shrouds in a beam-waveguide antenna system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the comparison of the input impedance as a function of the thickness h simulated with HFSS and obtained using expression (28) and using roots of (13) calculated with a Muller search in the complex plane. Three values of conductivity have been taken (5e7 S/m, 5e4 S/m, 5e3 S/m) in the range measured in [20]. As can be seen, results are in very good agreement.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 3 shows the comparison of the input impedance as a function of the thickness h simulated with HFSS and obtained using expression (28) and using roots of (13) calculated with a Muller search in the complex plane. Three values of conductivity have been taken (5e7 S/m, 5e4 S/m, 5e3 S/m) in the range measured in [20]. As can be seen, results are in very good agreement.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Results given in those papers were correct because good conductors were considered. In this paper, the input admittance will be studied widening the range of metals considered, including conductors with conductivity four order of magnitude lower than the one of copper, like low conductivity steel [20]. In the following, the dyadic Green's function of the parallel plate waveguide will be briefly discussed, and a rigorous expression of the input admittance of a coaxial probe radiating into the parallel plate will be calculated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar examples of lower-than-expected conductivity can be found in [24], where a conductivity of 0.8 MS/m for surface machined cold rolled steel at 24 GHz was reported, for which around 3 MS/m were expected at DC. An example of zinc- plated steel with an apparent 4 MS/m conductivity measured at 8.42 GHz was presented in [47], but no details were given about the zinc thickness and what galvanization technique was used; waves at this frequency would mostly interact with the zinc layer, with a skin depth of about 1.4 µm for pure zinc. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) ( 1 ) 0° incidence angle was obtained through the usc of approximate fOI111Ulas given in [18]. As may be seen from Equation (8), if six mirrors are involved, these noise temperatures for bare-metal mir rors alone were increased by about a factor of six, which is sur prisingly high.…”
Section: Plots As Functions Of Incidence Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise-temperature and gain-loss values for 6061-T6 alumimull were based on an electrical conductivity of 2.3 x 10 7 mhos/m[18]. FromFigure Sa, it can be seen that, at 00 incidence angle, the noise temperature, T;" of 6061-T6 aluminum was 0.23 K, and the bare-metal gain loss was 0.0034 dB.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%