DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-6828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electrochemical dissolution of copper sulfides using a fluidized bed electrochemical reactor

Abstract: INFORMATION TO USERSThis reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted.The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and Mallikarjunan, 1968) and ammoniacal (Hepel and Hepel, 1977) solutions have been studied previously, with the expected production of Cu(II), but chloride solutions have received surprisingly little attention. Felker (1984) found, however, that electrooxidation of chalcocite in a 4 mol/dm3 HC1 solution in a fluidized bed reactor gave univalent copper as the main product, but the reaction was not studied in detail. Cu(I) had previously been postulated to be an intermediate in the anodic dissolution of CuS (Ghali et al, 1982) but was not detected directly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Mallikarjunan, 1968) and ammoniacal (Hepel and Hepel, 1977) solutions have been studied previously, with the expected production of Cu(II), but chloride solutions have received surprisingly little attention. Felker (1984) found, however, that electrooxidation of chalcocite in a 4 mol/dm3 HC1 solution in a fluidized bed reactor gave univalent copper as the main product, but the reaction was not studied in detail. Cu(I) had previously been postulated to be an intermediate in the anodic dissolution of CuS (Ghali et al, 1982) but was not detected directly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%