Can a single oxygen spillover species on Pt explain the effect of electrochemical promotion of catalysis (EPOC or NEMCA, non-Faradaic electrochemical modification of catalytic activity, effect) with O 2À conductors such as YSZ (yttria-stabilized ZrO 2 ), as suggested in a recent paper published in this journal by Toghan, Rçsken and Imbihl, [1] or is it necessary to use the longtested sacrificial promoter mechanism, [2][3][4][5] which involves two oxygen species or-equivalently-two different oxygen adsorption states, a regular chemisorbed oxygen and a more ionic, more strongly bonded and less reactive spillover oxygen species (or state), commonly denoted aspoles, in the EPOC literature? [2][3][4][5] This question has been addressed in great detail by numerous older [6][7][8] and more recent [9][10][11][12] papers, which were unfortunately not cited by the authors of ref. [1]. For example, Figure 1 from ref. [9] shows oxygen temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) spectra obtained from a Pt-catalyst electrode deposited on YSZ and using 18 O 2 for gaseous O 2 adsorption. One observes that the more weakly bonded state b 2 is populated primarily by 18 O oxygen atoms resulting from the adsorption of 18 O 2 from the gas phase while the more strongly bonded state b 3 , which desorbs at 100 K higher temperature, is occupied almost exclusively by 16 Oatoms resulting from the spillover of lattice 16 O from the YSZ support. The existence of the two different states is also evident from the 16 O 18 O desorption peak, resulting from some isotopic scrambling in the catalyst surface, which takes place during the long timescale (~1400 s) of the experiment.[9] This time is much longer than the time (inverse of turnover frequency, TOF) associated with the catalytic process, which is electropromoted and is typically in the 0.1-10 s range. [3,10] Thus, this figure and many others [9,10] leave little room for any reasonable doubts about the validity of the sacrificial promoter, that is, a two-oxygen-species (or states) EPOC mechanism. [3,9] However, it is always useful to examine alternate mechanisms if data contradicting the sacrificial promoter mechanism are obtained. Þvalues up to 2.4] only under fuel-rich conditions where in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) showed that the surface is predominantly covered by a carbonaceous CH x layer [1] resulting from the adsorption of C 2 H 4 . They proposed that their data can be explained by an "ignition" mechanism, where "electrochemical O 2À pumping causes an ignition from an unreactive carbon-poisoned state of the surface to an active state with less carbon and clarified that the term "ignition" just refers to "a transition initiated by perturbation of a metastable state, but not to a temperature increase accompanying this transition". The authors criticized the currently accepted sacrificial promoter two-oxygen-species mechanism of electrochemical promotion [3][4][5] not for failing to explain their data, which is not at all the case as discussed Figure 1. Temperature-programm...