1985
DOI: 10.1021/ja00298a001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electron spin resonance spectrum of the tyrosyl radical

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
79
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
10
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 in SI). The notable inequivalence of these β-methylene hydrogen couplings demonstrates the presence of the chiral center in the free radical as is the case in L-tyrosine 16 . Loss of either the carboxyl or amino group would remove the asymmetry and make the β-methylene hydrogens equivalent as observed in the ESR spectrum of tryptamine (Fig.…”
Section: Esr Analyses Of Related Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…8 in SI). The notable inequivalence of these β-methylene hydrogen couplings demonstrates the presence of the chiral center in the free radical as is the case in L-tyrosine 16 . Loss of either the carboxyl or amino group would remove the asymmetry and make the β-methylene hydrogens equivalent as observed in the ESR spectrum of tryptamine (Fig.…”
Section: Esr Analyses Of Related Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, the lineshape of the Zt/Dt EPR spectrum does not strongly resemble that of the tyrosine radical in ribonucleotide reductase. This lack of similarity may arise from sensitivity of the methylene proton hyperfine interactions to the dihedral angle that measures their orientation with respect to the phenol ring (45,57). In fact, the EPR hyperfine couplings ofEscherichia coli ribonucleotide reductase and of bacteriophage T4 ribonucleotide reductase are quite different; this difference has been accounted for by variation in this dihedral angle (45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of similarity may arise from sensitivity of the methylene proton hyperfine interactions to the dihedral angle that measures their orientation with respect to the phenol ring (45,57). In fact, the EPR hyperfine couplings ofEscherichia coli ribonucleotide reductase and of bacteriophage T4 ribonucleotide reductase are quite different; this difference has been accounted for by variation in this dihedral angle (45). A possible interpretation of the apparent 1:3:3:1 ratio of partially resolved hyperfine lines in the oriented D+ spectrum (13,14) may involve accidental degeneracy in the coupling constants of three protons, one or two of which are methylene protons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Both CysSO ⅐ and GSO ⅐ have two ␤-methylene hydrogens, but in the latter, a hindered rotation of the methylene group that is adjacent to a chiral center is likely to result in the magnetic nonequivalence (44,45) reflected in the different hyperfine splitting constants (a H ) obtained for its two hydrogens (Fig. 4B).…”
Section: Oxidation Of Gsh and Cysteine-to Evaluate The Effects Of Hcomentioning
confidence: 99%