2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8cp01442f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electronic structure and the nature of the chemical bond in CeO2

Abstract: The X-ray photoelectron spectral structure of CeO2 valence electrons in the binding energy range of 0 to ∼50 eV was analyzed. The core-electron spectral structure parameters and the results of relativistic discrete-variational calculations of CeO8 and Ce63O216 clusters were taken into account. Comparison of the valence and the core-electron spectral structures showed that the formation of the inner (IVMO) and the outer (OVMO) valence molecular orbitals contributes to the spectral structure more than the many-b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18,19 However, this study is more concerned with heat emission which is in the infrared range and CeO 2 and CePO 4 would be expected to give similar emissivity in this range because infrared electromagnetic wave energy is only high enough to vibrate/rotate the bonds and not to excite electrons from valence band to a excited state. The significant difference between the two valence states of Ce is that the Ce 4f orbital in the Ce 4+ electronic structure participates in the chemical bonding of CeO 2 and partially loses its f-character so it does not have a valence band close to the Fermi edge (<2.5 eV difference).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18,19 However, this study is more concerned with heat emission which is in the infrared range and CeO 2 and CePO 4 would be expected to give similar emissivity in this range because infrared electromagnetic wave energy is only high enough to vibrate/rotate the bonds and not to excite electrons from valence band to a excited state. The significant difference between the two valence states of Ce is that the Ce 4f orbital in the Ce 4+ electronic structure participates in the chemical bonding of CeO 2 and partially loses its f-character so it does not have a valence band close to the Fermi edge (<2.5 eV difference).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having a valence band close to the Fermi edge can benefit emissivity in the visible range because lower energy; possibly as low as 2.5 eV, is needed for the electrons to be absorbed and become excited before the energy is re-emitted. 18,19 However, this study is more concerned with heat emission which is in the infrared range and CeO 2 and CePO 4 would be expected to give similar emissivity in this range because infrared electromagnetic wave energy is only high enough to vibrate/rotate the bonds and not to excite electrons from valence band to a excited state. Further study on the microstructure was done with (S) TEM and EDX.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for the U 4f 7/2 peak in the transition from metallic U to UO 2 , a BE shift Δ E b ≈ 3 eV was observed. If the effective charge were Q U = +4e − , the chemical shift of dozens eV would be observed, since it is known that one vacancy on the quasi‐core level in CeO 2 results in a 16.0 eV BE shift in, for example, the Ce 3d peak . A low effective charge characterizes the high contribution to the covalent component of the chemical bond in UO 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the calculation of the symmetry coefficients, we used the original code, which realizes the projection operators technique and includes the matrices of irreducible representations of double point groups and the transformation matrices presented in reference . A more detailed description of the calculation technique is given in reference .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 6 ] Besides, Ce being a member of the lanthanide group possesses unique luminescent properties bonded with an antenna‐like organic ligand for efficient luminescence and catalysis. [ 7 ] The two‐photon sensitisation nature, i.e. low energy excitation of the Ce, promotes the visible light photon harvesting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%