1992
DOI: 10.1016/0925-8388(92)90295-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The electronic structure of actinide dioxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is mainly due to the fact that the calculated band gap (1.1 eV) is highly underestimated in comparison to the experimental one (1.8 eV) [12]. The band-gap in UO 2 is of f -f nature and a strong U 5f -O 2p hybridization takes place [13]. This implies that one reason for the discrepancy between the experiment and the calculation is due to an underestimation of the Coulomb site interaction parameter U.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This is mainly due to the fact that the calculated band gap (1.1 eV) is highly underestimated in comparison to the experimental one (1.8 eV) [12]. The band-gap in UO 2 is of f -f nature and a strong U 5f -O 2p hybridization takes place [13]. This implies that one reason for the discrepancy between the experiment and the calculation is due to an underestimation of the Coulomb site interaction parameter U.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Such a ground state should have a zero magnetic moment, contrary to the large moment found in this work and in experimental observations. 46,47 Painstaking experiments by Morss et al 46 suggested that the magnetic moment in CmO 2 is not due to significant amounts of Cm 3+ impurities. 48 Morss et al 46 concluded that "a re-evaluation of the electronic ground states in the actinide dioxides may be needed."…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The lower valence band (10 eV < E b < 50 eV) is defined by the U 6p 3/2,1/2 -O 2s (C 2s) electron region (lifetime broadening determines the U 6p line-shape) and the U 6s core-level. [20][21][22][23][24] For the oxidized surface, the U 6p 3/2,1/2 binding energies are 17.2 eV and 27.8 eV, respectively, and the spin-orbit splitting of the U 6p 3/2,1/2 doublet is 10.6 eV. These U [25] and noting that they overlap, the manifold peak intensity would be affected in the U-carbide layer thus explaining the changing branching ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower valence band (10 eV < E b < 50 eV) is defined by the U 6p 3/2,1/2 -O 2s (C 2s) electron region (lifetime broadening determines the U 6p line-shape) and the U 6s core-level. [20][21][22][23][24] For the oxidized surface, the U 6p 3/2,1/2 binding energies are 17.2 eV and 27.8 eV,…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation