2014
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The elemental composition of the Sun

Abstract: We redetermine the abundances of all iron group nuclei in the Sun, based on neutral and singly-ionised lines of Sc, Ti, V, Mn, Fe, Co and Ni in the solar spectrum. We employ a realistic 3D hydrodynamic model solar atmosphere, corrections for departures from local thermodynamic equilibrium (NLTE), stringent line selection procedures and high quality observational data. We have scoured the literature for the best quality oscillator strengths, hyperfine constants and isotopic separations available for our chosen … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
209
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
(320 reference statements)
20
209
3
Order By: Relevance
“…If we restrict our average to the data of Hinode, VTT, and SST, which we think are of higher quality, we obtain: A (O) = 8.725 ± 0.012 and A (Ni) = 6.122 ± 0.034, the uncertainty being the observed-to-observed scatter. This latter value for the Ni abundance is in agreement with the value of A(Ni) = 6.17 ± 0.02 from Scott et al (2009) and in reasonable agreement with A(Ni) = 6.20 ± 0.04 from Scott et al (2015), who used an improved 3D solar model atmosphere with respect to Scott et al (2009). Our nickel abundance is almost within one σ of the Scott et al (2009) and of the Scott et al (2015) results.…”
Section: Line Profile Fittingsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we restrict our average to the data of Hinode, VTT, and SST, which we think are of higher quality, we obtain: A (O) = 8.725 ± 0.012 and A (Ni) = 6.122 ± 0.034, the uncertainty being the observed-to-observed scatter. This latter value for the Ni abundance is in agreement with the value of A(Ni) = 6.17 ± 0.02 from Scott et al (2009) and in reasonable agreement with A(Ni) = 6.20 ± 0.04 from Scott et al (2015), who used an improved 3D solar model atmosphere with respect to Scott et al (2009). Our nickel abundance is almost within one σ of the Scott et al (2009) and of the Scott et al (2015) results.…”
Section: Line Profile Fittingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, we believe it is unlikely that a re-analysis of the solar Ni abundance will result in a large downward revision. The recent result of Scott et al (2015), who find A(Ni) = 6.20 ± 0.04, corroborates this notion. For the meteoritic nickel abundance, Lodders (2003) recommends A(Ni) = 6.22±0.03, thus a nickel abundance as low as around 6.00 (THEMIS) would be in stark disagreement with the meteoritic nickel abundance.…”
Section: The Blending Nickel Linesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…For a Solar metallicity (ǫFe = 7.47 for the Sun or mFe/mH ≈ 0.0017; Scott et al 2015) we therefore see that the added iron from the planet increases the envelope metallicity too little to be observed.…”
Section: Destroying Planets and Polluting Giant Starsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The Nieva & Przybilla (2012) data also provide the abundances of the main coolants: H, He, C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Si, and Fe. For the light elements, we use the Lodders et al (2009) abundances, while for all other elements the abundances are based upon Scott et al (2015aScott et al ( , 2015b and Grevesse et al (2015). Thus, in the LGC scale, the "local region" reference abundance has + = 12 log O H 8.77 ( ) , as opposed to the Grevesse et al (2010) solar value of + = 12 log O H 8.69 ( ) .…”
Section: Description Of Shock Gridmentioning
confidence: 99%