During a recent meeting in Arkansas of counselor educators, elementary school counselors, and state department supervisors, the author was again forcefully reminded of the multiplicity of role expectations for elementary school counselors and the continuing search for an identity.The writer believes that the identity of the elementary school counselor should be defined by the needs of the educational system for more efficient and more effective, affective and cognitive development of children. Too often it seems that counselor role is being defined by the needs of state departments to expand their programs, by the needs of professors to promote their special training areas, or to protect certain skills for certain specialists, and by the needs of counselors for personal recognition. Our search for role definition should have as its goal the meeting of the needs of the local school and the children and therefore cannot be absolute and inflexible. Job functions must not become ends unto themselves.
PurposeThis study seeks further answers to the question of role definition explored by Raines (1964), Nitzschke (1964, Perrone and Evans (1964), Hill (1964), Donnelly and Parker (1965), Smith (1956), Hart (1963), Bosdell (1963), Oldridge (1964, McDougall andReitan (1963), andArcher andSplete (1965). These studies of the elementary school counselor's job functions sampled the view of counselors, teachers, principals, counselor educators, counselors in preparation, school phychologists, visiting teachers, and diagnosticians. A great many functions were assigned to the role of the elementary school counselor by these professional groups with apparent confusion concerning the importance attached to the functions. A common view is found in the emphasis placed upon consulting and adjustment counseling functions. Just how consulting Lamire H.