2022
DOI: 10.1108/s0733-558x20220000078003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Elusive Nature of Shareholders’ Claims Over the Corporation, or the Strange Non-death of Shareholder Primacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Shareholder's fund (SF) represents the residual claim that owners hold on a company's assets once all liabilities have been settled (Butzbach, 2022). It comprises the capital invested by shareholders through preferred or common shares, additional funds contributed beyond the initial investment, and retained earnings.…”
Section: Profitability (Roa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shareholder's fund (SF) represents the residual claim that owners hold on a company's assets once all liabilities have been settled (Butzbach, 2022). It comprises the capital invested by shareholders through preferred or common shares, additional funds contributed beyond the initial investment, and retained earnings.…”
Section: Profitability (Roa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their claim was now limited to the value of their shares and indirect control rights (Butzbach, 2022;Ireland, 1999). It is on this basis that critics of what has become known as "shareholder primacy" contend that shareholders "do not own corporations: corporations are independent legal entities that own themselves" (Stout, 2012, p. 6; see also Gelter, 2009;Robé, 2011).…”
Section: Expanding Organizational Architecture and Organizational Cap...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Lawson, we note that social ontology may be conceived as the study of the social realm, where the latter is taken as comprising those phenomena whose coming into being and/or continuing existence depends necessarily on human beings and their interactions. (Lawson, 2015, p. 30) Our contention is that knowledge claims about social constructs, including "corporations," are typically contingent (Butzbach, 2022;Ireland, 2010) as they rely upon the operation of particular relations of power to establish and maintain some degree of purchase and closure. And we attend to the study of social ontology by interrogating and recollecting the ways in which a particular power/knowledge relation, stabilized as a "discipline," deploys "procedures" for accumulating knowledge of social reality -for example, by rendering a social construct like the corporation meaningful, explicable, real, and so consequential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dentre as justicativas que sustentam a realização do trabalho estão: estudiosos alertam que são raros os estudos que enfatizem a redução da definição do usuário; este é um assunto relevante no âmbito da pesquisa contábil pelas implicações relacionadas à sociedade incluindo a responsabilidade da gestão na admistração do patrimônio e o impacto social, econômico e ambiental gerados pelas empresas e refletidos dentro e fora do ambiente dos reportes contábeis. ( Gray, 2002( Gray, , 2006Baxter 2000;Young 2006;Stout 2012;Flower 2017;Zeff 2013Zeff , 2016aMala & Chand 2015;Butzbach 2022); interessa aos estudos críticos saber quais são os discursos e as posições marginalizadas, Gendron ( 2018), e isso vale para o estudo da normatização contábil, Gallhofer & Haslam (2007), para adiante melhor endereçar seu aprimoramento alinhando ao bem estar social e ao equilíbrio ambiental.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified