Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icip.1996.560955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EM/MPM algorithm for segmentation of textured images: analysis and further experimental results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
4

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
37
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike previous approaches for incorporating Markov priors into the EM framework, SCEM does not limit the type of Markov model (as in [5]) nor the parameters that can be estimated (as in [4]). On a final note, we should mention that SCEM is not specific to nuclear segmentation, or even image segmentation, but instead is applicable to any task requiring the unsupervised estimation of MRF models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unlike previous approaches for incorporating Markov priors into the EM framework, SCEM does not limit the type of Markov model (as in [5]) nor the parameters that can be estimated (as in [4]). On a final note, we should mention that SCEM is not specific to nuclear segmentation, or even image segmentation, but instead is applicable to any task requiring the unsupervised estimation of MRF models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (2) follows from changing the order of summation and then summing out the superfluous variables. Note that the first term in (2) is the formulation proposed by Comer and Delp [4]. It is the second term that allows us to estimate the MRF parameters during the SCEM iteration.…”
Section: Derivation Of Spatially Constrained Expectation Maximizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We now compare the proposed method with three other segmentation techniques: a texture-based, Markovian Random Field (MRF) [6], a traditional The lack of topological control in both techniques yields a great amount of small contours, many of which are of no anatomical meaning. In order to obtain the same behaviour as the one provided by the topological control, segmentation by region based techniques such as MRF and K-means would require some post-processing, which, in general, is highly user dependent.…”
Section: Application To Object Detection In Gray Scale Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This edge-based segmentation process does not exhibit topology control, but ensures that a single, closed contour with no holes is obtained from an image. Traditional image processing and segmentation techniques based on edges or regions [3,11,4,22]; pattern recognition methods [23,5,13] and model-based such as Markovian Random Fields (MRF) and Fractals [6,25,19] do not exploit topological properties either.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%