“…This is despite the fact that numerous studies have acknowledged the existence of the sectoral effect in which different property sectors feature different property cycles (Benefield et al , 2009; Yavas and Yildirim, 2011; Hoesli et al , 2015; Lin et al , 2019a). Several studies have examined office REITs (Bohjalian, 2018), retail REITs (Newell and Peng, 2007), residential REITs (Newell and Fisher, 2009; Lin et al , 2019b), storage REITs (Bohjalian, 2018), lodging REITs (Jackson, 2009), Islamic REITs (Razali et al , 2015) and alternate REIT sectors (Peng and Newell, 2007; Marzuki and Newell, 2019). However, no comparable study has been devoted to I&L REITs in an international context, notwithstanding the recent rapid growth of Pacific Rim–based I&L REITs and the strong I&L property demand facilitated by e-commerce (Terzi, 2011; Xu et al , 2019), offshore manufacturing (McKinnon, 2009), shifting global distribution patterns (Cidell, 2011), increasing freight transport costs (Christopher, 2016), more intensive high digital technology use (Mathauer and Hofmann, 2019), moves towards the alternate property sectors for diversification (UNGC, 2018), the growth of infrastructure as an asset class (Peng and Newell, 2007) and the emergence of IT-related infrastructure (Marzuki and Newell, 2019).…”