2017
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1409337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Emergence of Environmental Health Literacy—From Its Roots to Its Future Potential

Abstract: Background:Environmental health literacy (EHL) is coalescing into a new subdiscipline that combines key principles and procedural elements from the fields of risk communication, health literacy, environmental health sciences (EHS), communications research, and safety culture. These disciplines have contributed unique expertise and perspectives to the development of EHL. Since 1992, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) has contributed to the evolution of EHL and now seeks to stimulate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
210
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
210
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[26] EHL is an emerging and evolving concept that bridges shared theories from the fields of health literacy, risk communication, environmental health science, behavioral science, public health, and other social sciences to represent skills related to identification and use of environmental information. [27][28][29][30] A challenge to understanding and addressing the influence of poor EHL is the potential mismatch between the public's perceptions of exposure and related risks and the often complex terminology and numeracy associated with environmental health risk information. Messaging and dissemination of important environmental health information, including such information related to fracking, comes from various sources, family, friends, the media and written channels, and often includes specific numerical and technical information that may be difficult for many to interpret and translate in terms of risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[26] EHL is an emerging and evolving concept that bridges shared theories from the fields of health literacy, risk communication, environmental health science, behavioral science, public health, and other social sciences to represent skills related to identification and use of environmental information. [27][28][29][30] A challenge to understanding and addressing the influence of poor EHL is the potential mismatch between the public's perceptions of exposure and related risks and the often complex terminology and numeracy associated with environmental health risk information. Messaging and dissemination of important environmental health information, including such information related to fracking, comes from various sources, family, friends, the media and written channels, and often includes specific numerical and technical information that may be difficult for many to interpret and translate in terms of risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Messaging and dissemination of important environmental health information, including such information related to fracking, comes from various sources, family, friends, the media and written channels, and often includes specific numerical and technical information that may be difficult for many to interpret and translate in terms of risk. [27,31,32] The National Institute of Environment Health Sciences (NIEHS) has been instrumental in advocating for the advancement in the field of EHL. [27,33,34] Among its strategic goals are "to increase scientific literacy and generate awareness of the health consequences of environmental exposures" and "to understand the disproportionate risks of disease and to define and support public health and prevention solutions in affected populations."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A good public health surveillance project should be more integrated with other informative systems to think of common general strategies and to promote health literacy in populations. [25,26] So it would be desirable to have a greater mutual cooperation between the press and the institutions in order to provide all the available information and make it more affordable, so that everyone can create an opinion as objective as possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%