The Emergence of High-Stakes Accountability Policies in Teacher Preparation: An Examination of the U.S. Department of Education’s Proposed Regulations

Abstract

Using a sociological framework this article explores the emergence and possible consequences of the 2015 U.S. Department of Education’s proposed federal regulatory policy on teacher education programs and alternative route providers. After describing the key features of the policy, we examine the research literature looking for evidence of the merits of accountability policies in improving teacher education and preparation quality and outcomes. Although there is some research evidence that increased accountability measures may indeed contribute to improving the quality and outcomes of teacher education and preparation, the conditions under which this happens are not straightforward. While the stated aim of the regulatory policy, to ultimately advance student learning, finds widespread support in the education community, research evidence points to a number of validity problems with the overall policy. Of particular concern is the policy’s attempts at establishing a direct link between teacher preparation and two of the regulations’ suggested outcomes, namely graduates’ employment and pupil achievement. The policy as conceived could negatively impact program norms and resources and undermine the development of teachers’ human, cultural, and social capital. We discuss the accreditation challenges that the policy is likely to confront and implications for the future of teacher education and preparation accountability.

Math and science outcomes for students of teachers from standard and alternative pathways in Texas

“…Poor performance according to these measures could lead to consequences as severe as program closure. The rules spurred considerable opposition (Tatto et al, 2016), and they were eventually rescinded by Congress in the spring of 2017. Even so, this idea has not gone away at the state level.…”

Building a dangerous outpost in the Green Mountain State: A case study of educator preparation policymaking

“…The openness of the charge and the comprehensive structure of the PRC supported agency. By working in partnership, teacher educators, regulators, and policymakers created a pathway for inclusive policymaking that allowed for multiple voices to be heard through a chaotic but genuine feedback process, which is an aspirational aim of the field (see Tatto et al, 2016).…”

Defining Program Effects: A Distribution-Based Perspective

“…In an age of accountability, it is critical to define and estimate the effects of various educational factors on student learning in a manner that allows stakeholders to explore potential reasons for what is observed and to enhance program quality and fidelity (Tatto et al 2016). When evaluating teacher training programs, Goldhaber (2013) suggested that such estimates should provide opportunities to answer more nuanced questions about the programs themselves and what features "quality" programs possess.…”